2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00138-019-01019-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soft decision optimization method for robust fundamental matrix estimation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We adopt the two testing datasets from the Affine Covariant Regions Datasets and USAC Datasets.The two Datasets were released by the Oxford University.We compared the proposed method with other state-of-art robust methods(M-estimator [10], LmeSeig [11], RANSAC [14], FNS [26], SDO [18], L2E-LSC [20]) using simulated data that contained different levels of Gaussian noise and false matches, as well as real images with different scenarios. In which process, the average epipolar distance of inliers were used as the evaluation performance criteria to test the accuracy [7].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We adopt the two testing datasets from the Affine Covariant Regions Datasets and USAC Datasets.The two Datasets were released by the Oxford University.We compared the proposed method with other state-of-art robust methods(M-estimator [10], LmeSeig [11], RANSAC [14], FNS [26], SDO [18], L2E-LSC [20]) using simulated data that contained different levels of Gaussian noise and false matches, as well as real images with different scenarios. In which process, the average epipolar distance of inliers were used as the evaluation performance criteria to test the accuracy [7].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As small a subset of the data as is feasible to estimate the parameters is used (e.g, seven correspondences for fundamental matrix estimation), and this process is repeated enough times, trying to find the largest consensus on an estimated F-matrix. Later, some researchers have presented different methods for improvement, such as LMedSeig, MLESAC and MAPSAC, SDO, etc [11], [15]- [18]. The key idea of these algorithms is to remove outliers independently based on the hypothesis testing strategy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The online process quickly receives the input data stream, and saves the clustering results it produces as the intermediate results of mining for users to query offline. Through online and offline processes, dynamic and fast data 4 Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing flow processing is realized, and users' needs for data flow analysis can be well met [24].…”
Section: Data Streammentioning
confidence: 99%