1995
DOI: 10.1109/18.412683
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soft-decision decoding of linear block codes based on ordered statistics

Abstract: Soft decision decoding of linear block codes based on ordered statistics is discussed in the context of multilevel coding with multistage decoding. Analytical expressions on the ordered statistics and the associated bit error probability have been derived. The result shows tradeos between error performance and decoding complexity in multilevel signaling including BPSK modulation formats as a special case.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
294
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 547 publications
(298 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
4
294
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If we compare the proposed algorithm with the Ordered Statistics Decoder (OSD) presented in [21], the main similarity is that both algorithms operate on the most reliable basis (first most reliable independent bit positions), which are then used to regenerate a codeword from the received word. The main differences between the two algorithms are how the candidate words are generated and the stop criteria.…”
Section: B Proposed Algorithm Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If we compare the proposed algorithm with the Ordered Statistics Decoder (OSD) presented in [21], the main similarity is that both algorithms operate on the most reliable basis (first most reliable independent bit positions), which are then used to regenerate a codeword from the received word. The main differences between the two algorithms are how the candidate words are generated and the stop criteria.…”
Section: B Proposed Algorithm Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deducing from the properties of ordered statistics [5], [13], the probability of S M to be the minimum sufficient set decreases quickly as M increases. As a result, M shall be a relatively small value.…”
Section: A Stage 1: Minimum Sufficient Set and Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The closer is the codeword to the optimal one, the closer the estimation to S min . Meanwhile, both the Chase-III algorithm [3] and the 1-OSD algorithm [5] are able to yield a codeword close to the optimal one with a low computational load. Putting them together, we first pick the best among all the codewords produced from the two algorithms, by choosing the one that has the minimum Euclidean distance to the received vector r. We then apply Theorem 2 on this good-quality codeword to generate a sufficient set close to S min .…”
Section: A Stage 1: Minimum Sufficient Set and Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations