2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2008.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soft and hard tissue changes after bimaxillary surgery in Turkish female Class III patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

6
48
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
6
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The observed effect on the contour of the chin (decrease of mentolabial angle) when the mandible was repositioned upward (openbite group) is in accordance with the findings of a study of Marşan et al, 20 who reported a correlation between an increase in the depth of the mentolabial fold and a decrease in the lower facial height.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The observed effect on the contour of the chin (decrease of mentolabial angle) when the mandible was repositioned upward (openbite group) is in accordance with the findings of a study of Marşan et al, 20 who reported a correlation between an increase in the depth of the mentolabial fold and a decrease in the lower facial height.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This effect may have influenced the result in the non-open-bite groups, in particular, having greater setbacks and to some extent disguised the effect of the maxillary advancement. This is one of the factors that may explain low soft to hard tissue ratios for the upper lip reported in T2 T1 to T2 T1 T2 T1 to T2 T1 T2 T1 some bimaxillary studies 13,19,20 compared to ratios for isolated maxillary advancement. 6,10,11 This assumption was supported by the regression analysis, which revealed that the upper lip position was positively correlated with movement of the lower incisors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…16 In particular, correction of the lower facial area by mandibular setback in Class III patients to achieve an improved facial profile with a reduced facial convexity angle and a less accentuated chin may lead to an extreme alteration in appearance. 17 On the one hand, the radical change in the profile with reduction of the facial convexity angle may contribute significantly to the delay in getting used to the new appearance, which was shown through the negative correlation with the changes in self-consciousness scores, whereas on the other hand, profile changes, including reduction of the labiomental angle and extension of the N-Pg distance, positively affected the QoL. Indeed, this led to a significant decrease of the impact scores of OH-5 and OH-6 postoperatively and therefore to increased psychological comfort.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various fixation techniques have been used for maxillary stabilization including trans-osseous and suspension wires, intraoral skeletal fixation appliances, and bone plating (Ueki et al, 2007;Marşan et al, 2009;Mavili et al, 2009;Kretschmer et al,2010). Post-operatively, the maxilla appears to be healed and in a stable position on clinical assessment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%