Soft and Hard Tissue Changes Following Treatment of Class II Division 1 Malocclusion with Twin-Block and Myofunctional Appliance: A Pilot Study

Myobrace versus twin block in the treatment of class II malocclusion in Children: A systematic review

“…Class II malocclusion is a common orthodontic problem that is often seen in adolescents, according to Xie et al, 2020 About thirty percent of malocclusion cases that dentists treat are class II division I malocclusions. Perrotta S. et al found that approximately 32.6 percent of the 700 youngsters they studied had class II malocclusion in their Italian study.7,8 According to Aufar RA, et al, malocclusion is thought to be the third most common dental disorder in Indonesia, after periodontal disease and dental caries, with a prevalence of over 80 % based on data from RISKESDAS 2018.…”

“…However, the twin block appliance is recognised for encouraging mandibular development and producing significant changes to the skeleton and dentoalveolar structure. According to Xie et al, 2020 the myobrace and twin block appliances had noteworthy outcomes when used to treat class II malocclusion, demonstrating similar effectiveness. ( Spalj et al, 2017 , Albajalan et al, 2020 ) The ANB angle is observed to be reduced by roughly 1.92 using the twin block appliance and 1.34 using myobrace.…”