2009
DOI: 10.1149/ma2009-01/42/1439
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SOFC Modeling and Parameter Identification by means of Impedance Spectroscopy

Abstract: not Available.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The optimum attachment temperature of both electrodes was determined, with especial attention to the one of the cathode side, after systematical evaluation of the polarization resistance in symmetrical cell configuration (not presented here for conciseness reasons). Area specific resistances of ASR=0.4 Ωcm 2 and ASR=0.2 Ωcm at 900ºC and activation energies of Ea=1.12±0.04 eV and Ea=1.43±0.02 eV were 2 obtained for the optimized anode and cathode layers, respectively, being in reasonable agreement with the literature [43] [44]. A detail of the attachment of a typical cathode to the electrolyte layer is presented in Figure 2c showing the good connnectivity required to ensure a high performance in SOFC mode.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The optimum attachment temperature of both electrodes was determined, with especial attention to the one of the cathode side, after systematical evaluation of the polarization resistance in symmetrical cell configuration (not presented here for conciseness reasons). Area specific resistances of ASR=0.4 Ωcm 2 and ASR=0.2 Ωcm at 900ºC and activation energies of Ea=1.12±0.04 eV and Ea=1.43±0.02 eV were 2 obtained for the optimized anode and cathode layers, respectively, being in reasonable agreement with the literature [43] [44]. A detail of the attachment of a typical cathode to the electrolyte layer is presented in Figure 2c showing the good connnectivity required to ensure a high performance in SOFC mode.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Furthermore, the semicircles in the lowfrequency range (<5 kHz) whose sizes change depending on the cell voltage represent the activation resistances. 21,22 The ohmic resistances are 77 ± 8 and 66 ± 2 Ω cm 2 for the 0-and 5-cycle samples, respectively. The relatively high ohmic resistance of the 0-cycle sample seems to be due to the reduced active cross-sectional area even at the initial stage of measurement as was also reported in the previous literature by Jung et al 23 The activation resistances are 47 ± 5 and 31 ± 3 Ω cm 2 for the 0-and 5-cycle samples at 0 h, respectively.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Butler‐Volmer type equations are used to describe the oxidation and reduction reactions and their voltage‐current density relationships [13, 14]: iH,loc=i0,Hexp()αHFηact,HRTexp()badbreak−(1αH)neFηact,HRT$$\begin{eqnarray} {{ \def\eqcellsep{&}\begin{array}{l} {i}_{H,\textit{loc}}={i}_{0,H}\left[\exp \left(\displaystyle\frac{{\alpha}_{H}F{\eta}_{\textit{act},H}}{\textit{RT}}\right)-\exp \left(-\displaystyle\frac{(1-{\alpha}_{H}){n}_{e}F{\eta}_{\textit{act},H}}{\textit{RT}}\right)\right] \end{array} }}\nonumber\hspace*{-10pt}\\ \end{eqnarray}$$ iO,loc=i0,Oexp()αOFηact,ORTexp()badbreak−(1αO)neFηact,ORT$$\begin{eqnarray} {{ \def\eqcellsep{&}\begin{array}{l} {i}_{O,\textit{loc}}={i}_{0,O}\left[\exp \left(\displaystyle\frac{{\alpha}_{O}F{\eta}_{\textit{act},O}}{\textit{RT}}\right)-\exp \left(-\displaystyle\frac{(1-{\alpha}_{O}){n}_{e}F{\eta}_{\textit{act},O}}{\textit{RT}}\right)\right] \end{array} }}\nonumber\hspace*{-10pt}\\ \end{eqnarray}$$where iH,loc${i}_{H,\textit{loc}}$ and iO,loc${i}_{O,\textit{loc}}$ represent local current density in hydrogen electrode and oxygen electrode respectively, α H and α O represent the charge transfer coefficients ...…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13] and Leonide et al. [14]): i0,Hbadbreak=γHpH2TPBapH2OTPBbexp()Eact,HRT$$\begin{equation} {i}_{0,H}={\gamma}_{H}{\left({p}_{{H}_{2}}^{\textit{TPB}}\right)}^{a}{\left({p}_{{H}_{2}O}^{\textit{TPB}}\right)}^{b}\exp \left(-\frac{{\mathrm{E}}_{\textit{act},H}}{\mathrm{RT}}\right) \end{equation}$$ i0,Obadbreak=γOpO2TPBmexp()Eact,ORT$$\begin{equation} {i}_{0,O}={\gamma}_{O}{\left({p}_{{O}_{2}}^{\textit{TPB}}\right)}^{m}\exp \left(-\frac{{\mathrm{E}}_{\textit{act},O}}{\mathrm{RT}}\right) \end{equation}$$where pTPB${p^{TPB}}$ stands for the partial pressure at the TPB. normalEact,H${\mathrm{E}}_{\textit{act},H}$ and normalEact,O${\mathrm{E}}_{\textit{act},O}$ are the activation energies for the respective oxidation/reduction reactions, along with the prefactors γH${\gamma _H}$ and γO${\gamma _O}$.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%