It was in 2000 when I received a call from Dr. John Sherman at Union Carbide. We had collaborated in the early 1980s on calcium-loaded synthetic zeolites for cation exchange in our wearable artificial kidney, a project that failed partly because zeolites were too soluble for use in dialysate regeneration or as oral sorbents. 1,2 John said, "I've got it!" I said, "You've got what?" He said, "What you always wanted, a cation exchanger with preference only for monovalent cations like potassium and ammonium." John explained that after the failure of zeolites to meet the requirements of an oral sorbent, he began to work with a company "UOP" that was partly owned by Union Carbide. UOP had gained experience in the molecular design of crystals with pores of precise size and charge. They had a crystal called ZS-9 (sodium zirconium cyclosilicate, or SZC), a cation exchanger with a strong affinity for monovalent cations but virtually no affinity for divalent cations (Figure 1). As a crystal, it was essentially insoluble, and, therefore, there were no concerns about the solubility of and safety of this sorbent.In the 1980s, I told John that if Union Carbide developed a selective sorbent for potassium I would test it as an oral sorbent in animals (for no charge). We had performed studies on the removal of uremic substances through the gut in the late 1970s using a "Roux-Y" intestinal bypass, so I knew how to measure the effects of oral sorbents. 3 John sent a sample of SZC, and also invited me to participate in the first public presentation on SZC, an abstract to be presented at the ASAIO meeting in 2001. 4 Our own in vitro tests soon confirmed that sodium-loaded SZC had uniquely high selectivity for potassium and ammonium and almost no affinity for divalent cations.I talked to Bob Truitt, my long-term business partner at HemoCleanse, about spending money on animal tests to study this brand-new potential oral therapy for hyperkalemia. As usual, we were short on cash, and working