“…This is probably due to wide variations in instrument blank values that were encountered occasionally with the Coleman nitrogen analyzer in our early studies. In this respect our experience has been similar to that of Flokstra and Nodolski (38 21 3,358 93 3,512 14 3,371 21 3,729 22 3,500 35 3,401 12 3,752 20 3,627 47 3,349 30 3 Solomon (11) and Selwyn and Dacie (9), but it is 13% higher than the results obtained by Czaczkes and co-workers (13), 6% lower than the mean value found by McCance and Widdowson, and 18% less than the value given by Choremis and associates (12) in children (Table VI). The discrepancy in results is probably due to minor differences in the composition of standards, in excitation conditions, or in the instruments used in the analysis.…”