2000
DOI: 10.1038/sj.gt.3301226
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sodium phosphate enhances plasmid DNA expression in vivo

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(66 reference statements)
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently it was reported that sodium phosphate enhances plasmid DNA expression in vivo possibly by inhibiting DNA degradation (Hartikka et al, 2000). When an electric pulse was not applied ( Figure 1A), luciferase activity with distilled water vehicle was about 3 times lower than with normal saline [87 ± 36 versus 269 ± 115 relative luminescence unit (RLU) per muscle, P > 0.05] and about 10 times lower than with sodium phosphate (87 ± 36 versus 904 ± 351 RLU per muscle, P < 0.05).…”
Section: Comparison Of the Effect Of The Three Vehiclesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently it was reported that sodium phosphate enhances plasmid DNA expression in vivo possibly by inhibiting DNA degradation (Hartikka et al, 2000). When an electric pulse was not applied ( Figure 1A), luciferase activity with distilled water vehicle was about 3 times lower than with normal saline [87 ± 36 versus 269 ± 115 relative luminescence unit (RLU) per muscle, P > 0.05] and about 10 times lower than with sodium phosphate (87 ± 36 versus 904 ± 351 RLU per muscle, P < 0.05).…”
Section: Comparison Of the Effect Of The Three Vehiclesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results indicated that noncarrier naked CRT/E7 DNA in ddH2O or TE buffer can generate better E7-specific immune responses and antitumor effects than in PBS buffer (Figures 4b and d). Hartikka et al 37 observed that the concentration, osmolarity and pH of sodium phosphate can influence plasmid DNA expression in vivo. The optimum sodium phosphate concentration was 150 mM and the luciferase expression was 4.3-fold compared with saline.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The luciferase expression decreased significantly, when solved in sodium phosphate solution less than 40 mM, compared to that of saline. 37 The sodium concentration of PBS buffer was only 6.7 mM in this study. This might be the reason why the PBS group did not generate as potent antigen-specific immune responses and antitumor effects as the other two groups in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Serum anti-NP IgG titers were measured in an indirect ELISA using 96-well plates (Corning Incorporated, Corning, NY, USA) coated with 71 ng/well of influenza A/PR/8/34 nucleoprotein (NP) purified from recombinant baculoviral extracts as previously described [19,21]. The anti-gB ELISA was performed as previously described [7].…”
Section: Antibody Elisa Assaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plasmid VR4700 was constructed by inserting the A/PR/8/34 influenza NP coding sequence into an expression plasmid containing the CMV immediate early 1 promoter/enhancer and intron A, a modified rabbit β-globin transcriptional terminator and an open reading frame encoding the kanamycin resistance gene [19,20]. Plasmids VCL6368 encoding a detoxified CMV antigen pp65, VCL6365 encoding a secreted form of the CMV gB antigen lacking the transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains, VR1255 encoding firefly luciferase, and VR2956 encoding feline erythropoietin (EPO) were constructed as previously described [7,21].…”
Section: Materials and Plasmid Constructsmentioning
confidence: 99%