1994
DOI: 10.1364/josaa.11.000825
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sodium-layer laser-guide-star experimental results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The brightness of the sodium beacon depends on the laser characteristics: the pulse duration and the repetition rate governing the saturation of the sodium D 2 transition, and the possibility of optical pumping effects increasing the efficiency of the atomic excitation. To produce sodium beacons, Jelonek et al (1994) used a sum frequency mode‐locked YAG laser, while others (Avicola et al 1994; Friedman et al 1994; Olivier et al 1994) used a pulsed YAG‐pumped dye laser. Theoretical calculations of Milonni et al for a pulsed laser give very good agreement with experimental results (Milonni, Fugate & Telle 1998) and explain the difference of excitation efficiency of different lasers.…”
Section: Long‐term Variations Of the Layermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The brightness of the sodium beacon depends on the laser characteristics: the pulse duration and the repetition rate governing the saturation of the sodium D 2 transition, and the possibility of optical pumping effects increasing the efficiency of the atomic excitation. To produce sodium beacons, Jelonek et al (1994) used a sum frequency mode‐locked YAG laser, while others (Avicola et al 1994; Friedman et al 1994; Olivier et al 1994) used a pulsed YAG‐pumped dye laser. Theoretical calculations of Milonni et al for a pulsed laser give very good agreement with experimental results (Milonni, Fugate & Telle 1998) and explain the difference of excitation efficiency of different lasers.…”
Section: Long‐term Variations Of the Layermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4) for a natural guide star and a laser guide star are similar. For both systems adaptive optics decreases residual phase fluctuations at low frequencies, with the correction losing its impact at frequencies greater than [5][6][7][8][9][10] Hz. The noise floor above 10 Hz (Fig.…”
Section: E Maxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several groups in the world have begun to explore the use of sodium laser guide star technique for astronomical adaptive optics (e.g. Jacobsen et al 1993;Jelonek et al 1994;Avicola et al 1994). In the Fall 1996, our group has successfully closed the laser guide star adaptive optics tip-tilt system loop and make improvements in the image quality (Lloyd-Hart et al 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%