1993
DOI: 10.1006/abio.1993.1527
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate-Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis for Mr Estimations of High-Molecular-Weight Polypeptides

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it cannot be excluded that a contaminating activity has been purified. On the other hand, the size of SnbD protein was not determined in the best conditions now used for such large peptide synthetases (26,32), and it is probably underestimated. In fact, it could be close to 400 or 500 kDa, the expected size for a four-module peptide synthetase.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it cannot be excluded that a contaminating activity has been purified. On the other hand, the size of SnbD protein was not determined in the best conditions now used for such large peptide synthetases (26,32), and it is probably underestimated. In fact, it could be close to 400 or 500 kDa, the expected size for a four-module peptide synthetase.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When membrane samples were heated for 5-20 min at 95°C to denature the protein in preparation for SDS-PAGE, as is the conventional method [22][23][24], no protein was detected likely due to HsPCFT aggregation and immobilization in the stacking gel. To establish con-ditions that obviate aggregation, plasma membrane protein fractions were prepared from HeLa cells 48 h after transfection with HsPCFT cDNA, then incubated in the loading buffer containing SDS with and without DTT at RT, 50°C, 75°C or 95°C for 10 min before PAGE.…”
Section: The Effect Of Temperature On Hspcft Protein Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A measurement macro (Scion Image) was used to determine T1 and T2 relative migration distances. Relative mobility (R f ) was calculated from the migration distance of the protein band divided by the migration distance of the dye front (Quandt et al 1993;Shapiro and Maizel 1969;Granzier and Wang 1993). Samples were run separately and then in combination to compare subtle differences in the mobility of T1 and T2 (Spierts et al 1997).…”
Section: Gel Electrophoresismentioning
confidence: 99%