The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2015
DOI: 10.30958/aje.2-2-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Socrates: Philosophy applied to Education - Search for Virtue

Abstract: This text shows itself as one of the results of a theoretical or bibliographical research, whose purpose is to explain this finality of the Socratic thinking, that is: the applying of philosophy into education, as the most efficient way of breeding the individual for a personal and collective existence which be, overall, reflexive. The present article goes in search of theoretical supporters, such as: Brun (1984), Cambi (1999), Dinucci (2009) and Plato (2004). Once upon the socratic philosophy has been reveale… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When using autistic participants, the growing evidence bases surrounding autistic sociality and systems of interpretation should be consulted in terms of designing interventions and arguing their significance. Furthermore, the suggestion that an intervention could never change thoughts, personality, or traits, is disputed (e.g., it is unknowable whether interventions cannot change personality; Lai, 2022), ignores the history of education (e.g., Socrates' methods and discourse) (see Batista, 2015;Mulhern, 1959) and how a person can be shaped by others (e.g., Vygotsky, 1978, on social learning theory). In regard to autistic people, being shaped by the world around them, including a higher rate of adverse events (e.g., Hoover & Kaufman, 2018;Kerns et al, 2015), may lead to passing and masking (Cage & Troxell-Whitman, 2019).…”
Section: Autistic Sociality and System Of Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When using autistic participants, the growing evidence bases surrounding autistic sociality and systems of interpretation should be consulted in terms of designing interventions and arguing their significance. Furthermore, the suggestion that an intervention could never change thoughts, personality, or traits, is disputed (e.g., it is unknowable whether interventions cannot change personality; Lai, 2022), ignores the history of education (e.g., Socrates' methods and discourse) (see Batista, 2015;Mulhern, 1959) and how a person can be shaped by others (e.g., Vygotsky, 1978, on social learning theory). In regard to autistic people, being shaped by the world around them, including a higher rate of adverse events (e.g., Hoover & Kaufman, 2018;Kerns et al, 2015), may lead to passing and masking (Cage & Troxell-Whitman, 2019).…”
Section: Autistic Sociality and System Of Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an age where information proliferates at an unprecedented pace, the ability to discern between fact and fallacy, between wisdom and mere information, is of paramount importance. Socratic inquiry, with its incisive questioning and insistence on the rigor of thought, provides an indispensable toolkit for navigating this sea of information (Batista, 2015). It prompts us to delve deeper, to scrutinize assumptions, and to extract meaning from the cacophony of voices that vie for our attention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%