Abstract:This text shows itself as one of the results of a theoretical or bibliographical research, whose purpose is to explain this finality of the Socratic thinking, that is: the applying of philosophy into education, as the most efficient way of breeding the individual for a personal and collective existence which be, overall, reflexive. The present article goes in search of theoretical supporters, such as: Brun (1984), Cambi (1999), Dinucci (2009) and Plato (2004). Once upon the socratic philosophy has been reveale… Show more
“…When using autistic participants, the growing evidence bases surrounding autistic sociality and systems of interpretation should be consulted in terms of designing interventions and arguing their significance. Furthermore, the suggestion that an intervention could never change thoughts, personality, or traits, is disputed (e.g., it is unknowable whether interventions cannot change personality; Lai, 2022), ignores the history of education (e.g., Socrates' methods and discourse) (see Batista, 2015;Mulhern, 1959) and how a person can be shaped by others (e.g., Vygotsky, 1978, on social learning theory). In regard to autistic people, being shaped by the world around them, including a higher rate of adverse events (e.g., Hoover & Kaufman, 2018;Kerns et al, 2015), may lead to passing and masking (Cage & Troxell-Whitman, 2019).…”
Section: Autistic Sociality and System Of Interpretationmentioning
Purpose:
The purpose of this letter to the editor is to further elucidate the arguments Keates (2022) and Beechey (2022) stated in their letters to the editor. Both Bambara (2022) and Camarata (2022) pose comments that require clarifying the original arguments, particularly regarding power and autistic sociality, which we feel will provide further clarity to this highly significant and growing topic within autism research.
Conclusion:
We recommend teaching not autistic people but rather non-autistic individuals about autistic sociality, in order to lower the burden on autistic interlocutors in cross-neurotype interactions and socialization (as per previous literature,
Bottema-Beutel et al., 2018
). We provide recommendations to address difficulties in cross-neurotype interactions—for example, bridging the neurotype gap through practice or psychosocial interventions for acceptance of autistic people and their system of interpretation, as per
Jones et al. (2021)
.
“…When using autistic participants, the growing evidence bases surrounding autistic sociality and systems of interpretation should be consulted in terms of designing interventions and arguing their significance. Furthermore, the suggestion that an intervention could never change thoughts, personality, or traits, is disputed (e.g., it is unknowable whether interventions cannot change personality; Lai, 2022), ignores the history of education (e.g., Socrates' methods and discourse) (see Batista, 2015;Mulhern, 1959) and how a person can be shaped by others (e.g., Vygotsky, 1978, on social learning theory). In regard to autistic people, being shaped by the world around them, including a higher rate of adverse events (e.g., Hoover & Kaufman, 2018;Kerns et al, 2015), may lead to passing and masking (Cage & Troxell-Whitman, 2019).…”
Section: Autistic Sociality and System Of Interpretationmentioning
Purpose:
The purpose of this letter to the editor is to further elucidate the arguments Keates (2022) and Beechey (2022) stated in their letters to the editor. Both Bambara (2022) and Camarata (2022) pose comments that require clarifying the original arguments, particularly regarding power and autistic sociality, which we feel will provide further clarity to this highly significant and growing topic within autism research.
Conclusion:
We recommend teaching not autistic people but rather non-autistic individuals about autistic sociality, in order to lower the burden on autistic interlocutors in cross-neurotype interactions and socialization (as per previous literature,
Bottema-Beutel et al., 2018
). We provide recommendations to address difficulties in cross-neurotype interactions—for example, bridging the neurotype gap through practice or psychosocial interventions for acceptance of autistic people and their system of interpretation, as per
Jones et al. (2021)
.
“…In an age where information proliferates at an unprecedented pace, the ability to discern between fact and fallacy, between wisdom and mere information, is of paramount importance. Socratic inquiry, with its incisive questioning and insistence on the rigor of thought, provides an indispensable toolkit for navigating this sea of information (Batista, 2015). It prompts us to delve deeper, to scrutinize assumptions, and to extract meaning from the cacophony of voices that vie for our attention.…”
This research paper explores the enduring relevance of Socratic philosophy and its applicability to the challenges faced by the young generation in today's complex and rapidly evolving society. Drawing upon the timeless wisdom of Socrates, this study aims to provide actionable advice for young individuals navigating the complexities of modern life. By examining key Socratic principles such as critical thinking, self-examination, and the pursuit of virtue, this paper offers a framework for personal growth, ethical decision-making, and the cultivation of a meaningful and purposeful life.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.