1998
DOI: 10.1006/jrpe.1997.2212
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sociosexuality and Motivations for Romantic Involvement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The rationale for this hypothesis stems from prior research by Gangestad (1991, 1992) and Jones (1998). They suggest that individuals with unrestricted sociosexual orientations are not motivated to enter and maintain romantic relationships for reasons that promote commitment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The rationale for this hypothesis stems from prior research by Gangestad (1991, 1992) and Jones (1998). They suggest that individuals with unrestricted sociosexual orientations are not motivated to enter and maintain romantic relationships for reasons that promote commitment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…They suggest that individuals with unrestricted sociosexual orientations are not motivated to enter and maintain romantic relationships for reasons that promote commitment. For example, Jones (1998) demonstrated that, whereas restricted sociosexuality is associated with intrinsic motivations to form and maintain relationships, such as desire for closeness, unrestricted sociosexuality is not. Similarly, Simpson and Gangestad (1992) found that unrestricted individuals are more likely to select romantic partners who possess traits such as physical attractiveness rather than communally oriented traits such as being affectionate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…During the dating years, individual differences in sociosexuality might be most clearly revealed in differential willingness to engage in sex prior to the development of commitment and strong emotional ties. During the marital years, sociosexuality might be most clearly evident in either differential willingness to remain in unsatisfactory marital relationships or differential susceptibility to being drawn out of such relationships by attractive alternative partners (Jones, 1998; Simpson & Gangestad, 1991). Sociosexuality is an important individual difference variable and more attention needs to focus on the sociosexual attitudes and behaviors of African American women, and its potential relationship to HIV risk-related sexual behavior.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For romantically involved individuals, differences in sociosexuality seem to be reflected in relationship quality, such that more unrestricted (vs. restricted) individuals tend to develop shorter and less committed relationships (Jones, 1998;Simpson & Gangestad, 1991;Simpson et al, 2004). They are also more likely to engage in infidelity (Seal, Agostinelli, & Hannett, 1994) and to perceive infidelity as more acceptable, albeit only under certain circumstances (e.g., in the context of a bad relationship; Feldman & Cauffman, 1999).…”
Section: Sociosexuality and Romantic Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 99%