2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.domaniend.2012.03.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sociosexual stimuli and gonadotropin-releasing hormone/luteinizing hormone secretion in sheep and goats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More recent reports have suggested that the presence of bucks or rams does not induce refractoriness to the male effect (delGadillo et al, 2006;. The introduction of new fertile males into these herds (containing males and females) triggers physiological and behavioral phenomena similar to those observed in females previously isolated from males (delGadillo et al, 2006;véliz et al, 2006;hawken and MarTin, 2012). Despite the relevance of these findings to the understanding of the male effect on female reproductive physiology, experimental settings are not practical to commercial goat and sheep production systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…More recent reports have suggested that the presence of bucks or rams does not induce refractoriness to the male effect (delGadillo et al, 2006;. The introduction of new fertile males into these herds (containing males and females) triggers physiological and behavioral phenomena similar to those observed in females previously isolated from males (delGadillo et al, 2006;véliz et al, 2006;hawken and MarTin, 2012). Despite the relevance of these findings to the understanding of the male effect on female reproductive physiology, experimental settings are not practical to commercial goat and sheep production systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It has been suggested that the male effect requires the complete isolation of males from females, in order to avoid visual, physical, hearing, or olfactory contact between the sexes (CheMineau, 1983(CheMineau, , 1987walkden-Brown et al, 1993;hawken and MarTin, 2012;keller and lévy, 2012). More recent reports have suggested that the presence of bucks or rams does not induce refractoriness to the male effect (delGadillo et al, 2006;.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The sociosexual relationships, particularly the "male effect," can be used to stimulate the activity of the hypothalamo-pituitary-ovarian axis in goats and ewes during the seasonal anestrus [1][2][3]. Indeed, the introduction of a male into a group of anovulatory females can induce and synchronize LH secretion, ovulations, and estrous behavior in the following 5 days [3][4][5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%