2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10649-012-9421-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sociological tools in the study of knowledge and practice in mathematics teacher education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the model of transmission, the recognition and realisation rules form a code of the acquisition within any pedagogic context. As discussed above, recognition and realisation are functions of classification and framing; ‘at the level of the acquirer, the recognition and realisation rules enable the ‘what and how’ for constructing the expected legitimate text’ (Parker and Adler, 2014: 206). Strong framing of pedagogic discourse between transmitter (the DfE) and the acquirer (BSOs) would suggest that the acquirers would possess, or have the ability to acquire, recognition (they should be able to recognise the voice of the policy) and realisation (they should be able to legitimately reproduce the policy’s message) rules required to enact the policy (Leow, 2011: 320).…”
Section: The Model Of Transmission Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the model of transmission, the recognition and realisation rules form a code of the acquisition within any pedagogic context. As discussed above, recognition and realisation are functions of classification and framing; ‘at the level of the acquirer, the recognition and realisation rules enable the ‘what and how’ for constructing the expected legitimate text’ (Parker and Adler, 2014: 206). Strong framing of pedagogic discourse between transmitter (the DfE) and the acquirer (BSOs) would suggest that the acquirers would possess, or have the ability to acquire, recognition (they should be able to recognise the voice of the policy) and realisation (they should be able to legitimately reproduce the policy’s message) rules required to enact the policy (Leow, 2011: 320).…”
Section: The Model Of Transmission Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One way of thinking about these issues is through Bernstein's theoretical work (1999Bernstein's theoretical work ( , 2003 on the ways that knowledge is socially constructed and circulated. This has been used to study school and teacher education settings (Bourne, 2003;Morais, 2002;Parker & Adler, 2014) and to argue that mathematics and mathematics education are different forms of knowledge (Lerman, Xu, & Tsatsaroni, 2002). Bernstein suggests that an area of knowledge derives a structure from the social ways in which it is produced and -importantly -how it is taught and learnt.…”
Section: Our Orientation To Teachers' Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within classrooms, a teacher is typically positioned as having access to knowledge and thus able, and required, to respond to students' legitimating appeals (Morais, 2002). However, it is a feature of mathematics that students can appeal to mathematics itself in their attempts to fix meanings -and in some pedagogies students are invited to do this (Parker & Adler, 2014). For example, mathematics teachers can step back from evaluating students' mathematics, point them to recognised ways of checking reasoning, and invite them to determine legitimacy from within mathematics itself.…”
Section: Our Orientation To Teachers' Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%