Sociogenomics of self vs. non-self cooperation during development of Dictyostelium discoideum

Abstract

BackgroundDictyostelium discoideum, a microbial model for social evolution, is known to distinguish self from non-self and show genotype-dependent behavior during chimeric development. Aside from a small number of cell-cell recognition genes, however, little is known about the genetic basis of self/non-self recognition in this species. Based on the key hypothesis that there should be differential expression of genes if D. discoideum cells were interacting with non-clone mates, we performed transcriptomic profiling study in this species during clonal vs. chimeric development. The transcriptomic profiles of D. discoideum cells in clones vs. different chimeras were compared at five different developmental stages using a customized microarray. Effects of chimerism on global transcriptional patterns associated with social interactions were observed.ResultsWe find 1,759 genes significantly different between chimera and clone, 1,144 genes associated significant strain differences, and 6,586 genes developmentally regulated over time. Principal component analysis showed a small amount of the transcriptional variance to chimerism-related factors (Chimerism: 0.18%, Chimerism × Timepoint: 0.03%). There are 162 genes specifically regulated under chimeric development, with continuous small differences between chimera vs. clone over development. Almost 60% of chimera-associated differential genes were differentially expressed at the 4 h aggregate stage, which corresponds to the initial transition of D. discoideum from solitary life to a multicellular phase.ConclusionsA relatively small proportion of over-all variation in gene expression is explained by differences between chimeric and clonal development. The relatively small modifications in gene expression associated with chimerism is compatible with the high level of cooperation observed among different strains of D. discoideum; cells of distinct genetic backgrounds will co-aggregate indiscriminately and co-develop into fruiting bodies. Chimeric development may involve re-programming of the transcriptome through small modifications of the developmental genetic network, which may also indicate that response to social interaction involves many genes with individually small transcriptional effect.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2164-15-616) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Temporal regulation of kin recognition maintains recognition-cue diversity and suppresses cheating

“…To test the broader applicability of our findings, we used four natural isolates, QS4, QS31, NC34.1 and NC105.1 (refs 21 , 23 , 26 , 27 ), in the same experimental system. All wild isolates segregated well from each other at 0 h ( Supplementary Fig.…”

Evolution of altruistic cooperation among nascent multicellular organisms

“…Microbes often cooperate to survive stressful conditions through collective action, perhaps best exemplified by altruistic behaviors such as fruiting body construction (Li et al. ) or cellular differentiation into spores and defensive cells that produce antibiotics until they lyse (Yague et al. ).…”

“…Microbes often cooperate to survive stressful conditions through collective action, perhaps best exemplified by altruistic behaviors such as fruiting body construction (Li et al 2014) or cellular differentiation into spores and defensive cells that produce antibiotics until they lyse (Yague et al 2012). A growing body of experiments shows that both common goods and group formation can evolve quickly in response to environmental challenges.…”

Moving the Research Forward: The Best of British Biology Using the Tractable Model System Dictyostelium discoideum

“…The central focus of much research in this model remains in the areas of cell movement, communication and development. However, a range of other research areas have been well represented by Dictyostelium researchers including biomedical sciences [ 12 , 13 ] and neurodegeneration [ 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 ]; infection and immunology [ 18 , 19 ]; autophagy [ 20 , 21 ]; social cooperativity [ 22 ]; and cancer and DNA repair [ 23 ]. The reasons for using Dictyostelium as a research model derive from a range of key advantages over mammalian systems including.…”