2010
DOI: 10.1590/s0074-02762010000600012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Socioepidemiological screening of serologically ineligible blood donors due to Chagas disease for the definition of inconclusive cases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
5

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(24 reference statements)
0
14
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Many risk factors or predictors were explored and found to be associated with chronic Chagas disease among blood donors [9,12,[17][18][19][20][21][22] and in rural area settings [23][24][25][26][27][28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many risk factors or predictors were explored and found to be associated with chronic Chagas disease among blood donors [9,12,[17][18][19][20][21][22] and in rural area settings [23][24][25][26][27][28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Em estudo desenvolvido no Hemocentro Regional de Uberaba, com 60 doadores inaptos sorológicos (30 repetidamente positivos e 30 com resultados inconclusivos), enquanto 40% dos primeiros apresentaram hemocultura positiva, este método parasitológico de confirmação de infecção chagásica foi 100% negativo nos inconclusivos, evidenciando a baixa ou mesmo ausência de correlação entre reação inconclusiva e doença de Chagas 29 .…”
unclassified
“…(8,11,20,28,29) Many studies report that inconclusive samples repeatedlyshowed negative results on using other tests. (11,26) …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies report that the combination of epidemiological data with results of high performance testing allows a more accurate view of the serologic status of donors (10,11) . To confirm these data, we find estimates for the sensitivity and specificity close to 100% for certain epidemiological covariates suggesting that it is important to consider the inclusion of covariates in the structure of the model to evaluate the performance of the diagnostic tests.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%