2002
DOI: 10.1086/341159
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Socioeconomic Status, School Quality, and National Economic Development: A Cross‐National Analysis of the “Heyneman‐Loxley Effect” on Mathematics and Science Achievement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
113
2
5

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 320 publications
(142 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
7
113
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Such insightful findings motivated Baker et al (2002) two decades later to test whether the "Heyneman-Loxley effect" was still valid, considering there had been significant increases in enrolment and provision of school resources and there have not been a systematic review of the "Heyneman-Loxley effect". Baker et al (2002) examined data from the Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) 3 of the 1990s and estimated using Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) 4 and observed that the "Heyneman-Loxley effect" had subsided.…”
Section: A=f(s Q C H I)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such insightful findings motivated Baker et al (2002) two decades later to test whether the "Heyneman-Loxley effect" was still valid, considering there had been significant increases in enrolment and provision of school resources and there have not been a systematic review of the "Heyneman-Loxley effect". Baker et al (2002) examined data from the Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) 3 of the 1990s and estimated using Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) 4 and observed that the "Heyneman-Loxley effect" had subsided.…”
Section: A=f(s Q C H I)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the increasing importance of education in the knowledge society, one hypothesis is that parents with a higher level of education will put more emphasis on their children's development of knowledge and skills than parents with a lower level of education, and this difference will be more pronounced in countries with a high level of social and economic development than in countries with a lower level of development (e.g., Baker et al 2002;Chudgar and Luschei 2009;Chiu 2007;Heyneman and Loxley 1982). We thus expect the relation between parental education and student achievement to increase as a function of the country level of social and economic development.…”
Section: Previous Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of family socioeconomic status (SES) was related to student achievement in the FIMS, indicating that the strong effect of family background noted in the contemporaneous Coleman Report (1966) was not restricted to the United States. More recent research has verified the continuing importance of family background to achievement in ILSAs (Baker et al, 2002;Woessman, 2004;Chudgar & Luschei, 2009;Montt, 2011). Methodological debates, particularly with respect to measuring SES, have resulted in varying estimates of SES-based inequality.…”
Section: Cross-country Differences In Within-country Variationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sousa and Armor (2010) also found that school resources could shrink achievement gaps (see also Montt, 2011). However, whether this phenomenon persists -or indeed ever existed -has been called into question using many of the same individual-and school-level ILSA data (Baker et al, 2002;Chudgar & Luschei, 2009;Hanushek & Luque, 2003).…”
Section: Efforts To Mitigate Educational Inequalitymentioning
confidence: 99%