Socioeconomic status, non-communicable disease risk factors, and walking speed in older adults: multi-cohort population based study

Abstract

ObjectiveTo assess the association of low socioeconomic status and risk factors for non-communicable diseases (diabetes, high alcohol intake, high blood pressure, obesity, physical inactivity, smoking) with loss of physical functioning at older ages.DesignMulti-cohort population based study.Setting37 cohort studies from 24 countries in Europe, the United States, Latin America, Africa, and Asia, 1990-2017.Participants109 107 men and women aged 45-90 years.Main outcome measurePhysical functioning assessed using the walking speed test, a valid index of overall functional capacity. Years of functioning lost was computed as a metric to quantify the difference in walking speed between those exposed and unexposed to low socioeconomic status and risk factors.ResultsAccording to mixed model estimations, men aged 60 and of low socioeconomic status had the same walking speed as men aged 66.6 of high socioeconomic status (years of functioning lost 6.6 years, 95% confidence interval 5.0 to 9.4). The years of functioning lost for women were 4.6 (3.6 to 6.2). In men and women, respectively, 5.7 (4.4 to 8.1) and 5.4 (4.3 to 7.3) years of functioning were lost by age 60 due to insufficient physical activity, 5.1 (3.9 to 7.0) and 7.5 (6.1 to 9.5) due to obesity, 2.3 (1.6 to 3.4) and 3.0 (2.3 to 4.0) due to hypertension, 5.6 (4.2 to 8.0) and 6.3 (4.9 to 8.4) due to diabetes, and 3.0 (2.2 to 4.3) and 0.7 (0.1 to 1.5) due to tobacco use. In analyses restricted to high income countries, the number of years of functioning lost attributable to low socioeconomic status by age 60 was 8.0 (5.7 to 13.1) for men and 5.4 (4.0 to 8.0) for women, whereas in low and middle income countries it was 2.6 (0.2 to 6.8) for men and 2.7 (1.0 to 5.5) for women. Within high income countries, the number of years of functioning lost attributable to low socioeconomic status by age 60 was greater in the United States than in Europe. Physical functioning continued to decline as a function of unfavourable risk factors between ages 60 and 85. Years of functioning lost were greater than years of life lost due to low socioeconomic status and non-communicable disease risk factors.ConclusionsThe independent association between socioeconomic status and physical functioning in old age is comparable in strength and consistency with those for established non-communicable disease risk factors. The results of this study suggest that tackling all these risk factors might substantially increase life years spent in good physical functioning.

Mental disorders and long‐term labour market outcomes: nationwide cohort study of 2 055 720 individuals

“…Whereas cross‐sectional and longitudinal survey studies have found that most mental disorders are associated with poor educational attainment , a recent register‐based study from the Netherlands founded that schizophrenia, but not depression or bipolar disorder, were associated with lower likelihood of obtaining secondary or higher education . Taken together, it seems that mental disorders can lead to irregular work careers and permanently low income, thus increasing the total economic burden of mental disorders .…”

Determinants of accelerated metabolomic and epigenetic aging in a UK cohort

“…Aging has been defined as the “time‐dependent decline of functional capacity and stress resistance, associated with increased risk of morbidity and mortality” (Burkle et al, 2015). Environmental stressors, including lifestyle and social adversity (Stringhini et al, 2018), psychological disorders (Chiu et al, 2018; Wolf & Morrison, 2017), and genetic factors (McDaid et al, 2017) may influence the aging process, leading to differing aging rates. Traditionally, quantitative assessment of “the rate of aging” relies on the analysis of mortality curves of populations.…”

Personality, disability‐free life years, and life expectancy: Individual participant meta‐analysis of 131,195 individuals from 10 cohort studies

“…Moreover, there seems to be no previous studies on personality and disability‐free life years. The concept of disability‐free life years extends the measurement of life expectancy by considering the years people can live without having any disabling conditions or morbidity that limits their ability to carry out daily activities (Stringhini et al, ). A long life is valuable, but a healthy and fully functional long life is even more valuable.…”