2016
DOI: 10.1161/strokeaha.116.013292
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Socioeconomic Status and the Quality of Acute Stroke Care

Abstract: Background and Purpose—The association of socioeconomic status (SES) with quality of stroke care is not well understood, and few studies have examined the association with different indicators of SES simultaneously. We assessed the impacts of low levels of education, occupation, and income on the quality of stroke care.\ud \ud Methods—We examined data from the China National Stroke Registry recording consecutive stroke patients between September 2007 and August 2008. Baseline low SES was measured using educati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Other vascular risk factors included current or previous smoking and moderate or heavy alcohol consumption (≥ 2 standardized alcohol drinks per day) and body mass index (BMI). Socioeconomic status (SES) included educational level, occupational class, and personal income level [ 10 ]. Occupational class was classified based on the main job types at admission.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other vascular risk factors included current or previous smoking and moderate or heavy alcohol consumption (≥ 2 standardized alcohol drinks per day) and body mass index (BMI). Socioeconomic status (SES) included educational level, occupational class, and personal income level [ 10 ]. Occupational class was classified based on the main job types at admission.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data regarding medications during hospitalization and at discharge were collected through medical records and data regarding medications during follow-up visits were collected by interviews between site investigators (neurologists) and patients. We used five evidence-based interventions 17 to document the performance of secondary prevention care of ischemic cerebrovascular event for each patient. It includes (1) antithrombotic treatment for patients who had no contraindications; (2) statins use for pa-tients with dyslipidemia or LDL-C ≥100 mg/dL who had no contraindications; (3) antihypertensive agents use for patients with hypertension who had no contraindications; (4) antidiabetic agents use for patients with diabetes mellitus who had no contraindications; and (5) anticoagulant agents use for atrial fibrillation who had no contraindications.…”
Section: Secondary Prevention Carementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar findings apply to the prognosis after a stroke in relation to recurrence,9 poststroke disability,10 and survival 8,11. Although few researchers have investigated inequality in the provision of stroke care, a social gradient has been identified in the likelihood of receiving evidence-based stroke care even in countries with free access to health care 8,12. Low income, lower educational level, and receipt of a disability pension have been found to be associated with a smaller chance of receiving care in accordance with clinical guideline recommendations 1318…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%