Socioeconomic status and cigarette expenditure among US households: results from 2010 to 2015 Consumer Expenditure Survey

Abstract

ObjectivesTo examine (1) the association between household socioeconomic status (SES) and whether a household spends money on cigarettes and (2) socioeconomic variations in proportion of total household expenditure spent on cigarettes among smoking households.MethodsWe pooled data from six consecutive years, 2010–2015, of the Consumer Expenditure Interview Survey. The interviews involved a structured questionnaire about household income, demographics and expenditures including expenditure on cigarettes. Households that reported cigarette expenditure in the previous 3 months were distinguished as smoking households. SES indicators were household poverty status, education and occupation of the head of household. Logistic regression was used to assess the association of household smoking status with SES. Fractional logistic regression was used to assess the association of cigarette expenditure as a proportion of total household expenditure with SES. The analysis sample size was 39 218.ResultsThe probability of spending money on cigarettes was higher among lower SES households. Households in poverty compared with those above 300% of poverty threshold had 1.86 (95% CI 1.61 to 2.16), households headed by a person with less than high school education compared with those headed by a person with at least a bachelor’s degree had 3.37 (95% CI 2.92 to 3.89) and households headed by a blue-collar work compared with those headed by a person in a managerial occupation had 1.45 (95% CI 1.26 to 1.66) higher odds of spending money on cigarettes. Similarly, the proportion of total household expenditure spent on cigarettes was higher among lower SES smoking households.ConclusionLower SES households are more likely to spend money on cigarettes and spend a larger proportion of their total expenditure on cigarettes. We recommend strategies effective in reducing smoking among low SES smokers.

A new Swedish reference for total and prepubertal height

“…However, smoking as the major reason for the finding of short stature should be interpreted with caution as smoking is known to be a proxy marker of socioeconomic status, which has long been known to influence childhood growth. 28,29 In the present study, we showed that Swedish infants and children grew taller than expected based on the WHO growth standard.…”

“…Our results showed individuals born to mothers who smoked during pregnancy to be on average as much as 2 cm shorter as adults than those born to non‐smoking mothers. However, smoking as the major reason for the finding of short stature should be interpreted with caution as smoking is known to be a proxy marker of socioeconomic status, which has long been known to influence childhood growth …”

Ever Use of E-Cigarettes Among Adults in the United States: A Cross-Sectional Study of Sociodemographic Factors

“…However, socioeconomic factors such as level of education, marital status, employment status, and poverty have been shown to be influenced by age, 42,43 sex, 44,45 and race. 46,47 In addition, because traditional cigarette use is influenced by socioeconomic factors, 48-52 it is logical that these factors would also translate to the use of e-cigarettes. Therefore, the statistical models with marital status, education level, employment status, and poverty-income ratio as exposures were adjusted for the sociodemographic factors of age, sex, and race.…”

The role of dwelling type on food expenditure: a cross-sectional analysis of the 2015–2016 Australian Household Expenditure Survey

“…Nonetheless, household expenditure data may be useful to explore trends and patterns of behaviours across dwelling types. Other studies have also used expenditure data to examine tobacco use (61)(62)(63) , gambling (62,64,65) , alcohol purchasing (62,66) and food purchasing (2,62,67) . This type of data can be an important tool to inform and develop health strategies and policies in various areas (68)(69)(70) .…”