2017
DOI: 10.1017/s0021932017000062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Socioeconomic Status and Adverse Birth Outcomes: A Population-Based Canadian Sample

Abstract: SummaryThis study assessed the strength of the association between socioeconomic status (SES) and low birth weight (LBW) and preterm birth (PTB) in Southwestern Ontario. Utilizing perinatal and neonatal databases at the London Health Science Centre, maternal postal codes were entered into a Geographic Information System to determine home neighbourhoods. Neighbourhoods were defined by dissemination areas (DAs). Median household income for each DA was extracted from the latest Canadian Census and linked to each … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
63
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
4
63
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…After duplicates were removed, 6542 publications were screened by title and abstract. Of these, 109 were retrieved for full‐text review and 41 studies were included in our scoping review …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After duplicates were removed, 6542 publications were screened by title and abstract. Of these, 109 were retrieved for full‐text review and 41 studies were included in our scoping review …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Epidemiological studies link perinatal cannabis use with low birth weight outcomes, though little is known about whether Δ9-THC alone underlies the fetal growth restriction observed [6][7][8][9][10] . While this is not the first study to show that 3 mg/kg Δ9-THC causes fetal growth restriction, we do believe that it is the first study in rats to demonstrate that this dose leads to symmetrical IUGR with post-natal catch up without any compromise to maternal outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Socioeconomic status (SES) is a powerful determinant of human health and disease, and social inequality is a ubiquitous stressor for human populations globally (Bogin, ; Goodman & Leatherman, ; Stinson, Bogin, & O'Rourke, ). For example, lower levels of education and/or income predict increased risk for all‐cause mortality (Meara, Richards, & Cutler, ; Nandi, Glymour, & Subramanian, ), heart disease (Diez‐Roux et al, ; Gonzalez, Artalejo, & Calero, ), diabetes (Brancati, Whelton, Kuller, & Klag, ; Everson, Maty, Lynch, & Kaplan, ), many cancers (Ward et al, ), depression (Lorant et al, ), adverse birth outcomes (Blumenshine, Egerter, Barclay, Cubbin, & Braveman, ; Campbell et al, ), and infectious disease (Cohen, Doyle, Turner, Alper, & Skoner, ). Furthermore, lower SES is associated with physiological processes that contribute to the development of disease, including but not limited to chronic inflammation, reduced cell‐mediated immunity, insulin resistance, cortisol dysregulation, and enhanced sympathetic nervous system activation (Chen & Miller, ; Cohen, Doyle, & Baum, ; McDade, Lindau, & Wroblewski, ; McEwen & Gianaros, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%