2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.rssm.2015.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Socioeconomic inequality in access to high-status colleges: A cross-country comparison

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0
9

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
50
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Jerrim, Chmielewski, and Parker (2015) demonstrated that high-achieving children from disadvantaged backgrounds were less likely to enter high-status colleges or universities than their more advantaged peers in Australia, the US, and England. Gibbons and Vignoles (2012) also found that English students from low-income backgrounds were less likely to attend high-status universities than their equally qualified peers from advantaged backgrounds.…”
Section: The Determinants Of Participation Into Higher Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Jerrim, Chmielewski, and Parker (2015) demonstrated that high-achieving children from disadvantaged backgrounds were less likely to enter high-status colleges or universities than their more advantaged peers in Australia, the US, and England. Gibbons and Vignoles (2012) also found that English students from low-income backgrounds were less likely to attend high-status universities than their equally qualified peers from advantaged backgrounds.…”
Section: The Determinants Of Participation Into Higher Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some have stressed the role of prior educational attainment (Gerber and Cheung 2008;Jerrim et al 2015), while others have pointed out a complex interplay of individual, family and contextual factors, such as level of aspirations, confidence, knowledge of the education system and the socioeconomic context of schools or neighbourhoods (Lareau 2011;Massey et al 2003;Reay et al 2005).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, private schools frequently admit students based on academic achievement, and academic achievement is associated with social origin (Jenkins, Micklewright, & Schnepf, 2008;Tavan, 2004). In this regard, private schools contribute to social segregation by attracting children who perform well at school (Hsieh & Urquiola, 2006) and children who come from higher social strata (Jerrim, Chmielewski, & Parker, 2015;Lankford & Wyckoff, 2001). Cross-national comparative studies support the hypothesis that social segregation in education systems increases as the proportion of private schools at national levels increases (Alegre & Ferrer, 2010;Le Donné, 2014).…”
Section: Private Schoolingmentioning
confidence: 99%