Socioeconomic inequalities in the prevalence of chronic diseases and preventive care among adults aged 45 and older in Shaanxi Province, China

Abstract

BackgroundMonitoring inequalities in chronic disease prevalence and their preventive care can help build effective strategies to improve health equality. Using hypertension and diabetes as a model, this study measures and decomposes socioeconomic inequalities in their prevalence and preventive care among Chinese adults aged 45 years and older in Shaanxi Province, an underdeveloped western region of China.MethodsData of 27,728 respondents aged 45 years and older who participated in the fifth National Health Services Survey conducted in 2013 in Shaanxi Province were analyzed. The relative indexes of inequalities based on Poisson regressions were used to assess disparities in the prevalence of hypertension and diabetes and their preventive care between those with the lowest and the highest socioeconomic status, and the concentration index was used to measure the magnitude of the socioeconomic-related inequality across the entire socioeconomic spectrum. The contribution of each factor to the inequality was further estimated via the concentration index decomposition.ResultsOur results indicate a higher prevalence of hypertension and diabetes among the rich than the poor individuals aged 45 years and older in Shaanxi Province, China. Among individuals with hypertension or diabetes, significant inequalities favoring the rich were observed in the use of preventive care, i.e. in adequate use of medication and of blood pressure/blood glucose monitoring. Furthermore, economic status, educational level, employment status, and urban-rural areas were identified as the key socioeconomic indicators for monitoring the inequalities in the patient preventive care.ConclusionsOur study suggests that the existence of clear inequities in the prevalence of chronic diseases and preventive care among adults aged 45 and older in Shaanxi Province, China. These inequalities in chronic diseases could be as much a cause as a consequence of socioeconomic inequalities.

Socioeconomic inequalities in hypertension in Kenya: a decomposition analysis of 2015 Kenya STEPwise survey on non-communicable diseases risk factors

“…We used the Wagstaff-type decomposition analysis of the concentration index [40] to examine the contribution of social determinants of inequality in hypertension. The method has been internationally accepted and has widely been used [41][42][43][44][45] to decompose inequalities across the full distribution of wealth index rather than between the richest and the poorest [37]. It allows for the overall concentration index to be decomposed into contributions of social determinants of health, in which each social determinant's contribution is obtained by multiplying the sensitivity of the outcome variable with respect to that determinant and the degree of wealthrelated inequality in that factor [37].…”

The effect of social participation on income-related inequality in health outcome among Chinese older adults

“… 37–40 If there is no income-related inequality in health outcome, the concentration index will equal zero. 41 Moreover, the absolute value of the concentration index is larger, indicating a greater degree of income-related inequality in health outcome. 42 In addition, the formula used for calculating the concentration index can be written as: \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{upgreek} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document} }{}\begin{equation*}C = \frac{2}{\mu }{\mathop{\rm cov}} ({y_i},{r_i}i),\end{equation*}\end{document} where C is the concentration index, μ is the mean of health outcome indicator, y i is the health outcome indicator and r i is the fractional rank of household income.…”

<p>The Effect of New Rural Cooperative Medical Scheme on the Socioeconomic Inequality in Inpatient Service Utilization Among the Elderly in China</p>

“…The concentration index ranges from −1 to +1. [23][24][25][26] The concentration curve plots the cumulative proportion of inpatient service utilization on the y-axis against the cumulative proportion of the sample on the x-axis, ranked by household income per capita from the poorest to the richest. 27 When the concentration index takes a positive value, the concentration curve lies below the diagonal, which indicates that inpatient service utilization is more concentrated among the higherincome older people, and vice versa.…”