2015
DOI: 10.1186/s12939-015-0152-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Socioeconomic inequalities and mental stress in individual and regional level: a twenty one cities study in China

Abstract: ObjectivesThis study will examine explanatory variables including socioeconomic inequalities related to mental stress at both the individual and regional level.MethodologyA cross-sectional multistage sampling process was used to obtain participants. Data on mental stress and individual socioeconomic status were gathered via face to face interview. Regional variables were retrieved from a national database. Multilevel logistic regression analysis was used to assess socioeconomic variances in mental stress.Resul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The association between socio-economic inequalities and stress realized in our study was different than those reported by others. For instance, Wang et al (2015) reported higher stress with lower income and lower regional per capita gross domestic product, while Barnay (2016) found a varying relationship depending on the employment arrangement and working conditions. Also, in our male sample, overweight was significantly associated with perceived stress.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The association between socio-economic inequalities and stress realized in our study was different than those reported by others. For instance, Wang et al (2015) reported higher stress with lower income and lower regional per capita gross domestic product, while Barnay (2016) found a varying relationship depending on the employment arrangement and working conditions. Also, in our male sample, overweight was significantly associated with perceived stress.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has shown great validity and reliability even though it is less frequently used for diagnostic purposes (e.g., Lu and Zhang ; Xu and Yu ; Wang et al. ). In addition, subjective self‐rated depression has shown good interitem correlation to other symptom‐based scales (Abdel‐Khalek ; Bazargan, Bazargan‐Hejazi, and Baker ; Cheng and Furnham ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All respondents provided the following sociodemographic information: age, sex, race/ethnicity, grade, major, parental occupation, annual household income, and family residence. Mental stress was measured using the Chinese version of the Perceived Stress Scale (CPSS) [25,26].This scale comprises 14 items that address perceptions of stress during the month prior to the survey. Items were rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale, and ranged from 0 (never) to 4 (very often).…”
Section: Individual-level Independent Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%