2020
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033296
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Socioeconomic gradients of adverse birth outcomes and related maternal factors in rural and urban Alberta, Canada: a concentration index approach

Abstract: ObjectiveUsing a summary measure of health inequalities, this study evaluated the distribution of adverse birth outcomes (ABO) and related maternal risk factors across area-level socioeconomic status (SES) gradients in urban and rural Alberta, Canada.DesignCross-sectional study using a validated perinatal clinical registry and an area-level SES.SettingThe study was conducted in Alberta, Canada. Data about ABO and related maternal risk factors were obtained from the Alberta Perinatal Health Program between 2006… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Models were determined a priori and were adjusted for the following variables based on existing evidence: maternal age at delivery 23 (<20, 20-24, 25-29, 30-34, 35-39, ≥40); marital status at birth registration 24 (married, partner, single); area deprivation based on levels of index of multiple deprivation score 25 26 (for babies born in 2005 and 2006, index of multiple deprivation scores from 2004 and 2007 were used, respectively); child’s ethnicity based on the 2001 census classification (white British, white other, Bangladeshi, Indian, Pakistani, black African, black Caribbean, other); mother’s country of birth 27 (UK or non-UK born); mode of delivery 28 (vaginal, caesarean section); parity 9 24 (nulliparous, parous); month of birth 29 (January-March, April-June, July-September, October-December), sex 26 (male, female), and small for gestational age 9 (yes, no).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Models were determined a priori and were adjusted for the following variables based on existing evidence: maternal age at delivery 23 (<20, 20-24, 25-29, 30-34, 35-39, ≥40); marital status at birth registration 24 (married, partner, single); area deprivation based on levels of index of multiple deprivation score 25 26 (for babies born in 2005 and 2006, index of multiple deprivation scores from 2004 and 2007 were used, respectively); child’s ethnicity based on the 2001 census classification (white British, white other, Bangladeshi, Indian, Pakistani, black African, black Caribbean, other); mother’s country of birth 27 (UK or non-UK born); mode of delivery 28 (vaginal, caesarean section); parity 9 24 (nulliparous, parous); month of birth 29 (January-March, April-June, July-September, October-December), sex 26 (male, female), and small for gestational age 9 (yes, no).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 30 In other countries, for example, Canada and France, heterogeneity in the impact of deprivation by rurality on adverse pregnancy outcomes has been found. 31 32 The French study 32 found differences in risks of SGA comparing women living in deprived areas in rural and urban Brittany. Deprivation experienced by women living in rural areas may differ from that of women in urban areas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We found that primiparous women with severe mental disorders had low SES. Previous studies have shown that smoking is more frequent among women, who are unmarried and/or have low educational attainment ( 14 , 18 ). One study including nulliparous women focused on their health literacy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In pregnant women, mental disorders are associated with socioeconomic status (SES) ( 12 , 14 , 17 , 18 ). In most studies, SES is associated with maternal age, smoking, educational attainment, income, and cohabiting ( 12 , 14 ). Smoking is more frequent among women, who are unmarried and/or have low educational attainment ( 14 , 18 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%