2017
DOI: 10.1080/09581596.2017.1383599
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Socioeconomic factors and mass shootings in the United States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This research suggests that understanding the connection between inequality and mass shootings, especially in high-income communities, could be instrumental in reducing the likelihood of this very real public health threat. Our results support previous work on the relationship between inequality and aggression ( 5 , 6 ) and extend work on mass shootings by examining the role of household income ( 2 ). Specifically, the key contribution of this research is the finding of a strong interaction effect between inequality and income on mass shootings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This research suggests that understanding the connection between inequality and mass shootings, especially in high-income communities, could be instrumental in reducing the likelihood of this very real public health threat. Our results support previous work on the relationship between inequality and aggression ( 5 , 6 ) and extend work on mass shootings by examining the role of household income ( 2 ). Specifically, the key contribution of this research is the finding of a strong interaction effect between inequality and income on mass shootings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…These results show little variation between income inequality and mass shootings over time, a result that is most robust during later years when data should be least biased, suggesting that our results are not an artifact of the data source. Previous studies also examined similar models using two other mass shootings datasets (USA Today and Mother Jones), showing outcomes did not vary by dataset ( 2 ). Based on our diagnostics, we are confident the correct method (negative binomial regression) was used in our analyses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Individual behaviour and community norms are thus the priority for change; broader structural factors that might drive violence are reduced to 'modulating' factors (Riemann, 2019). Kwon and Cabrera's (2019) analysis of mass shootings in the US likewise identifies and addresses the side-lining of structural factors in explanations of violence. Accounts of mass shootings have invariably focused on individual motives, relying on societal stereotypes concerning mental health that have little support in the evidence (Kwon & Cabrera, 2019).…”
Section: Public Health and Violencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kwon and Cabrera's (2019) analysis of mass shootings in the US likewise identifies and addresses the side-lining of structural factors in explanations of violence. Accounts of mass shootings have invariably focused on individual motives, relying on societal stereotypes concerning mental health that have little support in the evidence (Kwon & Cabrera, 2019). Their study is an important departure then in seeking to locate explanations within a broader context of economic and social structures that may induce anger, frustration, and ultimately violence by those most severely affected in society.…”
Section: Public Health and Violencementioning
confidence: 99%