2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Socioeconomic effects of a bottom-up multifunctional land consolidation project

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Existing scholars noticed that some rural areas in China explored the autonomous governance mode adopted by delving into farmland fragmentation and have made remarkable achievements (Lu et al, 2019; Zhang et al, 2019). Through “bottom‐up” coordination and communication, this mode applies the organizational path of “farmer orientation, community dominance, and governmental guidance”, focuses on solving the problem of tenure fragmentation for smallholder production (Callesen et al, 2022; Wang et al, 2022). Therefore, future farmland fragmentation consolidation should not only depend on the institutional safety of policy supply, capital support, and technological promotion under the administrative mode dominance but should also absorb organizational coordination, benefit distribution, and risk prevention under autonomous governance mode (Figure 7).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing scholars noticed that some rural areas in China explored the autonomous governance mode adopted by delving into farmland fragmentation and have made remarkable achievements (Lu et al, 2019; Zhang et al, 2019). Through “bottom‐up” coordination and communication, this mode applies the organizational path of “farmer orientation, community dominance, and governmental guidance”, focuses on solving the problem of tenure fragmentation for smallholder production (Callesen et al, 2022; Wang et al, 2022). Therefore, future farmland fragmentation consolidation should not only depend on the institutional safety of policy supply, capital support, and technological promotion under the administrative mode dominance but should also absorb organizational coordination, benefit distribution, and risk prevention under autonomous governance mode (Figure 7).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Industry and population are two critical influencing factors for socioeconomic development ( Mitter et al., 2020 ; Callesen et al., 2022 ). A high level of socioeconomic development can facilitate the implementation of FCAM ( Jiang et al., 2015 ; Mugiyo et al., 2021 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim of FCAM is to identify the most suitable places for the operation of agricultural machinery ( Collins et al, 2001 ; Duan et al., 2021 ; Janus and Ertunç, 2021 ; Beyer et al., 2022 ). In many countries (e.g., Japan and South Korea), FCAM is used as a land management tool to eliminate the adverse effects of land fragmentation and to improve and promote agricultural mechanization ( Callesen et al., 2022 ; Washizu and Nakano, 2022 ). The rules and regulations for FCAM projects vary from country to country ( Janus and Ertunç, 2022 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The available research mainly explains the effect of land costs on operators' cropplanting selections in terms of the factor substitution drive of land and labor [53,54] or the substitution of agricultural machinery services [47]. However, the level of development of the agricultural land transfer market is significantly correlated with the establishment of explicit land costs and formation of implicit land costs [23,40]. The pricing of land costs is more developed and the transaction procedure is clearer in countries where the land transfer market is more developed [21].…”
Section: Mechanism Of Action: Degree Of Land Transfer Market Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in the current common perception, land transfer rent is, by default, characterized as the cost of land in rural China [17]. In fact, in the process of agricultural cultivation, operators spend on land includes not only the externally explicit land transfer rent but also other types of implicit costs, such as land searching [19,20], negotiating for renting the land [21,22], and finishing costs of the land after renting [23,24]. None of these costs are included in the cost of land, but they do represent actual costs associated with farmers' usage of the land.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%