2001
DOI: 10.1071/nb01038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Socioeconomic differentials in life expectancy and years of life lost in Victoria,1992?1996

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As previous studies also show that rural young drivers are overinvolved in fatal or severe crashes,14 15 and SES and rural residence are strongly correlated,16 17 place of residence (eg, urban, inner regional or rural) is likely to be an important determinant of crash-related injury. However, previous studies focusing on the effect of SES among young drivers' crash risk have failed to either measure or adjust for place of residence or other important risk factors including driving exposure, which may overestimate the risk.…”
mentioning
confidence: 70%
“…As previous studies also show that rural young drivers are overinvolved in fatal or severe crashes,14 15 and SES and rural residence are strongly correlated,16 17 place of residence (eg, urban, inner regional or rural) is likely to be an important determinant of crash-related injury. However, previous studies focusing on the effect of SES among young drivers' crash risk have failed to either measure or adjust for place of residence or other important risk factors including driving exposure, which may overestimate the risk.…”
mentioning
confidence: 70%
“…87,104,112,111,113 Thus, highest incidences of heart disease, diabetes, obesity, elevated blood lead levels, lower birthweight, and stomach, lung, cervical, ovarian and bladder cancers all occur in disadvantaged areas and populations, 22 as do higher levels of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, asthma, sudden infant death syndrome, road traffic accidents and homicide. 46,[114][115][116][117] By contrast, however, rates of colorectal cancer, female breast cancer and leukaemia are higher in affluent areas. 117 Evidence that rurality contributes to health indicators in ways over and above socioeconomic factors is not consistent.…”
Section: Socioeconomic Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…46,[114][115][116][117] By contrast, however, rates of colorectal cancer, female breast cancer and leukaemia are higher in affluent areas. 117 Evidence that rurality contributes to health indicators in ways over and above socioeconomic factors is not consistent. 17 Several studies have found little or no rural-urban variation in health status for particular diseases and conditions after controlling for variables relating to socioeconomic status.…”
Section: Socioeconomic Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arguably, Australia's rural residents suffer poorer quality health care because of the acknowledged undersupply of the health and medical workforce 1,2 . These workforce shortages contribute to lower utilisation rates for medical services by rural populations along with poorer health status and health outcomes than urban populations 3–6 . Governments have invested significantly in programs to improve workforce supply and hence the quality of rural health care services as part of their commitment to ensure equity of service provision 7 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%