2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11113-011-9206-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Socioeconomic Differences According to Family Arrangements in Chile

Abstract: Family arrangements, Socioeconomic wellbeing, Reproduction of inequalities, Marriage, Cohabitation, Second demographic transition,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…I describe here the main variables considered in the multivariate analysis, namely, relationship and socioeconomic status and the aforementioned child-related variables. The distribution of the variables for this analytic sample generally follows the same patterns as the distribution in the complete sample at baseline (Salinas 2011). About thirty percent of the women in the sample were married at the first birth, 45 percent were cohabiting, 18 percent were dating the baby's father, and about 8 percent had ended the relationship with the baby's father.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…I describe here the main variables considered in the multivariate analysis, namely, relationship and socioeconomic status and the aforementioned child-related variables. The distribution of the variables for this analytic sample generally follows the same patterns as the distribution in the complete sample at baseline (Salinas 2011). About thirty percent of the women in the sample were married at the first birth, 45 percent were cohabiting, 18 percent were dating the baby's father, and about 8 percent had ended the relationship with the baby's father.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…The fertility decline started in the mid-sixties, and today, the total fertility rate is 1.76 (INE 2015). The proportion of children born outside of marriage has greatly increased over the last few decades, going from 16 percent of children born outside of marriage in the mid-1960s to 68 percent in 2010 (Salinas 2011). The crude marriage rate reached a peak of about 9 per thousand in the 1930s, and then remained relatively unchanged until the 1960s, when it started to show a slight decrease, which has accelerated since the 1990s.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because many couples prefer to live together without being married (Salinas 2011), in April 2015 the senate approved the law of civil union, which is a contract between two people who share a household (Ministerio Secretaría General de Gobierno 2015). Only a year has passed since the enactment of the law, so there are currently no studies that describe the characteristics and motivations of those who choose this type of union over marriage.…”
Section: Families/householdsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This explanation is consistent with the postulates of the SDT. However, it has always been recognized that the SDT's theoretical apparatus will not likely fi t perfectly in societies that have still not solved the problem of material needs and must address these needs simultaneously as they begin to face higher order needs (Cabella et al 2005 ;Salinas 2011 ;Ramm 2013 ) At the end of the 2000s, the controversy between social disintegration and SDT as explanations for the increase in cohabitation became diluted. This dilution can probably be explained by the lack of appropriate data that link union formation patterns and ideational change.…”
Section: Historical Trends In Cohabitation In the Southern Conementioning
confidence: 99%