Abstract:Introduction Questionnaires are used commonly to assess functional outcome and satisfaction in surgical patients. Although these have in the past been administered through written forms, there is increasing interest in the use of new technology to improve the efficiency of collection. The aim of this study was to assess the availability of internet access for a group of orthopaedic patients and the acceptability of online survey completion. Methods A total of 497 patients attending orthopaedic outpatient clini… Show more
“…In addition, we used an HIV-specific instrument that was developed together with patients and that measures preferences as well as experiences. Furthermore, to reduce potential sampling bias related to online survey research [ 17 ], respondents were provided with the option of filling out a hard copy version of the questionnaire.…”
Introduction: Responding to patients' needs and preferences is important in the delivery of outpatient care. Recent and systematically collected data reflecting human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients' opinions on how their outpatient care should be delivered are lacking. Our aim was to identify aspects of care
“…In addition, we used an HIV-specific instrument that was developed together with patients and that measures preferences as well as experiences. Furthermore, to reduce potential sampling bias related to online survey research [ 17 ], respondents were provided with the option of filling out a hard copy version of the questionnaire.…”
Introduction: Responding to patients' needs and preferences is important in the delivery of outpatient care. Recent and systematically collected data reflecting human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients' opinions on how their outpatient care should be delivered are lacking. Our aim was to identify aspects of care
“…We consider the fact that we have data from all the treatment centres in the country to be a strength of this study. Furthermore, we offered the option of completing out a paper version of the questionnaire, to reduce sampling bias that can occur when collecting patient-reported data online [ 20 ]. Finally, the open-ended nature in which respondents could state their views and concerns provided us with a variety of information that we could not have anticipated had we chosen to offer a limited number of answers.…”
BackgroundThe costs of combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) for HIV, consisting of separate, particularly generic, components (multiple-tablet regimens, MTR) are generally much lower than those of single-tablet regimens (STR) comprising the same active ingredients.ObjectivesTo assess whether patients would be willing to take MTR, once-daily, instead of STR, with the goal of reducing general healthcare costs. In addition, we aimed to examine whether willingness was associated with particular patient characteristics.MethodsData from the ATHENA cohort database in The Netherlands of adult HIV-1-infected patients in care and taking cART ≥6 months were used to select 1000 potential participants for an online patient survey on patient preferences and satisfaction. Participants were asked whether they would be willing to take three pills with the equivalent active ingredients simultaneously instead of STR to reduce costs. Multivariate logistic regression was used to examine associations between patient characteristics and willingness to take MTR instead of STR.ResultsForty-seven percent (n = 152) of the 322 respondents answered ‘yes’ and 26 % (n = 83) answered ‘maybe’ when asked whether they would be willing to take three pills with the equivalent active ingredients simultaneously to reduce costs. Non-Dutch patients were significantly more likely to answer ‘no’ (OR: 2.49; 95 % CI: 1.17–5.30) or ‘maybe’ (OR: 2.63; 95 % CI: 1.24–5.60). Answering ‘no’ was less common among patients who had been taking cART ≥15 years (OR: 0.23; 95 % CI: 0.09–0.58). Commonly reported concerns included the dosing frequency, efficacy and tolerability of MTR.ConclusionsHIV-infected patients do not necessarily oppose the decision to prescribe MTR instead of STR to reduce healthcare costs. However, the potential trade-off in terms of convenience should be carefully weighed against the projected savings.
“…Interestingly, the authors found 72% of respondents to have internet access, and 40% indicated a preference for outcomes assessments to take place via email or the internet, while the remaining preferred a face-to-face evaluation or standard mail. 13…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The administration of electronic PRO surveys via email poses a unique set of obstacles to effective administration and high patient compliance, such as a lack of internet access, outdated email addresses, use of spam/junk mail folders, ease of dismissal, impersonal nature, and risk of survey fatigue. Jenkins et al 13 conducted an investigation in 2016 in which they surveyed 497 patients who presented to an orthopaedic outpatient clinic regarding their accessibility to the internet and preferred means for completing follow-up questionnaires. Interestingly, the authors found 72% of respondents to have internet access, and 40% indicated a preference for outcomes assessments to take place via email or the internet, while the remaining preferred a face-to-face evaluation or standard mail.…”
Background:Patient-reported outcome (PRO) surveys have become increasingly important in both improving patient care and assessing outcomes.Purpose/Hypothesis:The purpose of this study was to evaluate which variables are associated with compliance with completing PRO surveys in patients who have undergone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). The authors hypothesized that older patient age and longer time since ACLR would be associated with lower completion rates of PRO surveys preoperatively and at postoperative time points.Study Design:Case series; Level of evidence, 4.Methods:All patients who underwent ACLR by a sports medicine fellowship–trained orthopaedic surgeon at a single institution and were electronically assigned PRO surveys through a data collection system preoperatively between December 2013 and March 2015 were included. Postoperatively, PRO surveys were sent to patients’ email addresses at 6, 12, and 24 months. Demographics, history, and operative and postoperative information were evaluated for an association with survey completion rates.Results:A total of 256 patients met the inclusion criteria. There were 140 (54.7%) male and 116 (45.3%) female patients, with an overall mean age of 28.6 ± 11.9 years. Only 19 (7.4%) patients completed all preoperative and postoperative surveys at all time points. Less than half of the patients (n = 104; 40.6%) completed both the preoperative survey and at least 1 postoperative survey. There was a steady decrease in the completion rate of PRO surveys postoperatively over time (Pearson r = –0.995, P = .005). Male patients had significantly worse compliance with completing PRO surveys preoperatively and at a minimum of 1 time point postoperatively (P = .044). Patients who did not identify as athletes or report frequent exercise (≥3 times/wk) had significantly worse compliance with completing any PRO surveys (P = .046). Lower body mass index was associated with greater odds of compliance with completing the preoperative survey and 24-month postoperative survey (odds ratio, 0.902; P = .029).Conclusion:An inverse relationship was found between the surgery-to-survey period and percentage of those completing PRO surveys, with poor overall compliance. Male sex and not self-identifying as an athlete or performing frequent physical exercise were associated with lower completion rates of PRO surveys, while lower body mass index was associated with a greater rate of completion.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.