2018
DOI: 10.1111/cdoe.12419
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Socioeconomic and psychosocial associations with oral health impact and general health

Abstract: For both oral health impact and general health utility, objective SES was significant in the presence of subjective SES. Psychosocial variables had important independent associations with both oral and general health.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
20
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
4
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Especially, the correlation coefficient ρ = .61 between trust and satisfaction from a previous study 31 is commensurate with r = .67 from Table 1. It is also worth noting that OHRQoL scores were associated with SES variables in both bivariate analyses and adjusted full model, which is in agreement with the findings from the study of a similar framework 30 …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Especially, the correlation coefficient ρ = .61 between trust and satisfaction from a previous study 31 is commensurate with r = .67 from Table 1. It is also worth noting that OHRQoL scores were associated with SES variables in both bivariate analyses and adjusted full model, which is in agreement with the findings from the study of a similar framework 30 …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Variables were entered progressively into the model in five individual block entry steps (DPR and four confounding variable blocks), two clustered block entry steps (dental/oral health cluster and demographic/SES cluster), and a full model, to compare changes of regression coefficients and variance explained. The sequential entry of blocks and comparison with a full model has been adopted in a similar context of an empirical study and demonstrated its practical application to assess plausible mediation effects among variables 30 . Missing values in multi‐item scales ≤ 20% were imputed using the expectation‐maximization algorithm with an iterative maximum likelihood estimation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of this study showed that adverse psychosocial conditions were associated with a worse impact of oral health on quality of life, even after adjustment for demographic, socioeconomic, behavioral, and oral health service-related variables. A possible explanation for the greater impact in individuals with a worse psychosocial profile would be the fact that these variables, directly and indirectly, affect attitudes and behaviors that represent a risk to health 33,34 . For example, lower levels of social support were associated with a worse perceived impact of oral health on quality of life.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, stress might increase anxiety, directly affecting the immune system and decreasing the salivary flow. In addition to this process, we could infer that anxiety, psychological stress, and depression could indirectly influence the oral health, leading, for example, to greater consumption of candies, facilitating the progression of dental caries and periodontal diseases 34,38 . However, in the present study, the consumption of candies was not associated with either the outcome or the perceived stress.…”
Section: Rev Bras Epidemiol 2020; 23: E200049mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Facial burn patients are reported to have psychosocial problems related to dissatisfaction with facial image, low self-esteem and problems to re-integrate and adapt to a new life. Stress, anxiety and depression, which are not uncommon to them, are also risk factors of tooth decay, periodontal disease, and tooth loss (13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27). Recent evidence suggests that the burden of oral diseases in facial burn patients is high (28) and potentially impact on the oral health-related quality of life, but the evidence is currently a limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%