Socioeconomic and Geographical Disparities in Under-Five and Neonatal Mortality in Uttar Pradesh, India

Abstract

As a part of the Millennium Development Goals, India seeks to substantially reduce its burden of childhood mortality. The success or failure of this goal may depend on outcomes within India's most populous state, Uttar Pradesh. This study examines the level of disparities in under-five and neonatal mortality across a range of equity markers within the state. Estimates of under-five and neonatal mortality rates were computed using five datasets, from three available sources: sample registration system, summary birth histories in surveys, and complete birth histories. Disparities were evaluated via comparisons of mortality rates by rural-urban location, ethnicity, wealth, and districts. While Uttar Pradesh has experienced declines in both rates of under-five (162-108 per 1,000 live births) and neonatal (76-49 per 1,000 live births) mortality, the rate of decline has been slow (averaging 2 % per annum). Mortality trends in rural and urban areas are showing signs of convergence, largely due to the much slower rate of change in urban areas. While the gap between rich and poor households has decreased in both urban and rural areas, trends suggest that differences in mortality will remain. Caste-related disparities remain high and show no signs of diminishing. Of concern are also the signs of stagnation in mortality amongst groups with greater ability to access services, such as the urban middle class. Notwithstanding the slow but steady reduction of absolute levels of childhood mortality within Uttar Pradesh, the distribution of the mortality by sub-state populations remains unequal. Future progress may require significant investment in quality of care provided to all sections of the community.

Let’s Take it to the Clouds: The Potential of Educational Innovations, Including Blended Learning, for Capacity Building in Developing Countries

“…Decentralisation is intended to reduce current patterns of inequity [3][4][5] and improve service delivery by encouraging the development of local solutions and accountability for local problems. 6 However, at lower levels of the health hierarchy, many health managers lack the skills and competencies needed to run a health system, particularly those located in the most remote or poor locations.…”

A population-based study of neonatal mortality and maternal care utilization in the Indian state of Bihar

“…It is estimated that 40% of all under-five deaths are in neonates, and nearly 40% of these neonatal deaths occur on the first day of life and nearly three-fifths during the first 3 days [ 7 – 9 ]. For India, with a population of about 1.3 billion, it is important to have relevant data at the sub-national levels, including improved estimates and causes of infant, neonatal and under-5 child mortality, which would help direct child survival resources appropriately, particularly in the poor and populous states of India that account for a large proportion of child deaths [ 7 , 10 , 11 ]. India also scores poorly on equity in child health, with a child born to poor parents several times more likely to die than a child born to rich parents [ 6 ].…”

“…India also scores poorly on equity in child health, with a child born to poor parents several times more likely to die than a child born to rich parents [ 6 ]. Furthermore, important linkages exist between access to maternal and child health care services and neonatal mortality [ 8 , 10 , 12 – 15 ]. The MDG 5 is aimed at improving maternal health [ 3 ], for which data at the sub-national levels are also needed as the national level data often mask inequities within the country [ 10 , 12 , 13 , 16 ].…”

Entrenched Geographical and Socioeconomic Disparities in Child Mortality: Trends in Absolute and Relative Inequalities in Cambodia

“…We should note that increases in inequality for neonatal outcomes have been observed notwithstanding reductions in the equity gap for services like skilled birth attendant and antenatal care. This seems to suggest that similar to other settings, increases in coverage for disadvantaged populations might lack adequate levels of quality of care [40] . Therefore, more attention and resources should be devoted to measures targeting quality beyond extending coverage of critical interventions.…”