2022
DOI: 10.1289/isee.2022.p-0767
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sociodemographic Determinants of PFAS Contamination in United States Community Water Supplies: An Analysis of Sampling Data from 11 States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because our research questions examined the link between local communities and drinking water PFAS concentrations, only data from CWS were retained for our analysis. The final synthesized data set included 44,111 samples from 7873 CWS in 18 states that conducted either statewide monitoring campaigns (Colorado: CO, Illinois: IL, Indiana: IN, Kentucky: KY, Massachusetts: MA, Maine: ME, Michigan: MI, New Hampshire: NH, New Jersey: NJ, Ohio: OH, Vermont: VT, and Wisconsin: WI) or targeted monitoring next to contamination sources (California: CA, Maryland: MD, New York: NY, Pennsylvania: PA, South Carolina: SC, and Utah: UT) . Additional details on data sources, synthesis, and processing are provided in the Supporting Information (Table S1 and Figures S1 and S2).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because our research questions examined the link between local communities and drinking water PFAS concentrations, only data from CWS were retained for our analysis. The final synthesized data set included 44,111 samples from 7873 CWS in 18 states that conducted either statewide monitoring campaigns (Colorado: CO, Illinois: IL, Indiana: IN, Kentucky: KY, Massachusetts: MA, Maine: ME, Michigan: MI, New Hampshire: NH, New Jersey: NJ, Ohio: OH, Vermont: VT, and Wisconsin: WI) or targeted monitoring next to contamination sources (California: CA, Maryland: MD, New York: NY, Pennsylvania: PA, South Carolina: SC, and Utah: UT) . Additional details on data sources, synthesis, and processing are provided in the Supporting Information (Table S1 and Figures S1 and S2).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%