“…Because our research questions examined the link between local communities and drinking water PFAS concentrations, only data from CWS were retained for our analysis. The final synthesized data set included 44,111 samples from 7873 CWS in 18 states that conducted either statewide monitoring campaigns (Colorado: CO, Illinois: IL, Indiana: IN, Kentucky: KY, Massachusetts: MA, Maine: ME, Michigan: MI, New Hampshire: NH, New Jersey: NJ, Ohio: OH, Vermont: VT, and Wisconsin: WI) or targeted monitoring next to contamination sources (California: CA, Maryland: MD, New York: NY, Pennsylvania: PA, South Carolina: SC, and Utah: UT) . Additional details on data sources, synthesis, and processing are provided in the Supporting Information (Table S1 and Figures S1 and S2).…”