2020
DOI: 10.1080/13504509.2020.1788661
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sociocultural vitality versus regulation policy and tourism development in preservation of traditional rural landscape: a case from Guizhou, China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, many rural vitality index systems only take into account economic, demographic, and social-cultural factors, as well as other factors related to development [33], while do not directly consider factors related to the preservation. Meanwhile, other index systems, such as 'social and cultural vitality indicators' [47] and 'cultural heritage vitality indicators' [48], are inadequate in representing the variations in cultural heritage preservation and rural construction and development capabilities. This is the primary cause of regional disparities in rural vitality levels.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, many rural vitality index systems only take into account economic, demographic, and social-cultural factors, as well as other factors related to development [33], while do not directly consider factors related to the preservation. Meanwhile, other index systems, such as 'social and cultural vitality indicators' [47] and 'cultural heritage vitality indicators' [48], are inadequate in representing the variations in cultural heritage preservation and rural construction and development capabilities. This is the primary cause of regional disparities in rural vitality levels.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, the protection of traditional rural landscapes is not only affected by exogenous driving factors such as top-down policies and tourism, but also by endogenous driving factors originating from rural social and cultural backgrounds, including social and cultural vitality. There is a strong positive correlation with the integrity of traditional rural landscapes; compared with exogenous driving factors (top-down regulatory policies and tourism development), endogenous driving factors (i.e., the connection between people and the environment) have a greater impact on residents' commitment to the protection of traditional rural landscapes, and cognition, intention, and behavior have a more pervasive and positive impact [42].…”
Section: Landscape Perception and Visual Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an evolved and changing society, internal resource issues pose the greatest obstacles, whereas the promotion of a rural destination presents external obstacles (Rosalina et al, 2021). In promoting traditional rural tourism, there needs to be community strength, in addition to the need to increase the internal capacity of the countryside and opportunities for a more inclusive development strategy for the future conservation of rural tourism; policymaking; and rural tourism development (Jia et al, 2020). Research Saarinen et al (2020) explains that the absence of local benefits and participation in tourist development restricts the capacity of tourism to be developed for the achievement of sustainable local development.…”
Section: Correlation Of Cbt With Sustainable Development To Improve C...mentioning
confidence: 99%