2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10113-015-0784-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sociocultural valuation of ecosystem services to improve protected area management: a multi-method approach applied to Catalonia, Spain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
29
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The differences were smaller in the education and economic sector of the sample, most likely due to the rural and socioeconomic homogeneity of the local population; for example, in the case of education, the percentage of inhabitants with college-level studies was minimal, a situation similar to other fishing villages in Chile [56]. A study of sociocultural valuation done in a nature park in Spain showed that the main characteristics that influenced the valuation were age, place of residence, and education [28]; however, the level of education in that study was higher than that reported in Tubul. Finally, regarding the age variable, we obtained results similar to those of Oteros-Rozas et al [29], with young people having the highest perception of food-related services and older people having the highest perception of the habitat for species services.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The differences were smaller in the education and economic sector of the sample, most likely due to the rural and socioeconomic homogeneity of the local population; for example, in the case of education, the percentage of inhabitants with college-level studies was minimal, a situation similar to other fishing villages in Chile [56]. A study of sociocultural valuation done in a nature park in Spain showed that the main characteristics that influenced the valuation were age, place of residence, and education [28]; however, the level of education in that study was higher than that reported in Tubul. Finally, regarding the age variable, we obtained results similar to those of Oteros-Rozas et al [29], with young people having the highest perception of food-related services and older people having the highest perception of the habitat for species services.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The biophysical value domain is concerned with physical characteristics of ecosystems and their components, the economic -with monetary values of ES, and the socio-cultural -with preferences and principles held by people towards nature (Pascual et al, 2017). The latter are expressed by socially formed and personally held values that cannot be measured in monetary or biophysical terms (Maestre-Andrés et al, 2016). These values describe the importance, worth or usefulness of ES to people and can be instrumental, intrinsic or relational depending on the context (Chan et al, 2016;Walz et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introduction and Case Study Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies showed that rural communities tend to value NCP, especially concerning water, food production, and air quality [27,34,35] and that the difference in the socioeconomic profile can influence the perception of the importance of such contributions, mainly about income and education, but also age and gender [27,36,37]. PAs, on the other hand, tend to be valued for the benefits they provide, but more appropriate use could contribute to poverty reduction in nearby rural communities [38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%