Sociocultural determinants of nomadic women’s utilization of assisted childbirth in Gossi, Mali: a qualitative study

Abstract

BackgroundIn sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), nomads account for 30 to 60 million people. Their mobility, due to a constant search for pastures and water points, makes health services less accessible to them. Few nomadic women use assisted delivery, which increases the risk of maternal mortality. The reasons behind this limited use have been poorly documented. The objective of this study was to understand the sociocultural determinants of assisted childbirth by nomadic women.MethodsWe conducted a qualitative research in the health area of Gossi (Mali), mainly populated by nomads. Data were collected through a literature review, 26 semi-structured interviews, a non-participant observation, and a logbook. Nomadic women who gave birth in the past three months were included in the study, whether they used assisted delivery or not. A thematic content analysis was performed with QDA Miner software.ResultsThe study identified a complex combination of determinants resulting in the use or non-use of assisted childbirth by the nomads of Gossi. Several participants recognized the value of assisted delivery but gave birth at home. They identified sociocultural determinants related to their representations and bodily experiences; the risks and emotions (fear, stress, anxiety) associated with pregnancy; the onset of labor and delivery; and their weak autonomy in terms of movement, decision-making, and economic agency. Nomadic women are not free in their movements, and in order to seek care, they require the permission and support of a man (husband, brother, or father). Furthermore, the participants are housewives, and men control family resources and make decisions regarding all financial matters. Assisted delivery is often only considered when there are complications.ConclusionThis research has made it possible to understand the sociocultural determinants of the use of assisted childbirth among nomadic women, which should be taken into account when organizing health services for these populations.

‘Leaving no one behind’: a scoping review on the provision of sexual and reproductive health care to nomadic populations

“…The 31 articles included in the review were published between 2002 and 2018, with 22 of them being published in peer-reviewed journals [11–32]. Ten articles reported on original research using qualitative methods [11, 12, 15, 16, 20, 24–26, 29, 31], 6 used mixed methods [13, 21, 27, 28, 30, 32], one was based on secondary analysis of data [14], one involved a case study [19], and one used a checklist and standardized SES scores that were developed as part of the study [18]. There were also two review articles [22, 23], one unpublished research that used mixed methods [33], three commentaries [34–36], four reports [6, 37–39], and one thesis for a Master’s degree [40].…”

“…Bedouin women in Lebanon perceive the health system as being underpinned by institutional discrimination against their ethnic group [15]. Similarly, surveys and interviews with nomadic women in Kenya, Mali, and India reported mistreatment or discrimination by healthcare workers [16, 25, 26, 29].…”

“…With a lack of political advocacy, nomadic populations are left out of health policy agendas including those that aim to increase access to modern RH services [15]. Another way in which nomads are vulnerable to political factors is through regional political conflict [29, 38]. In several cases, regions inhabited by nomads are riddled with conflict.…”

Preferences for formal and traditional sources of childbirth and postnatal care among women in rural Africa: A systematic review

“…The rural women also varied in marital status, education level, religious affiliation, parity, and health conditions before or at the time of data collection. S4 Appendix fully describes the preferences for sources of childbirth and PNC services and the corresponding factors that may influence these preferences from all 37 studies [31–67].…”

Nomads' access to the current healthcare system is impaired by their perception of its cost, quality, and accessibility and by gender segregation in Timbuktu, Mali: A cross-sectional study

“…More than 63.26% of the study participants had an average monthly income lower than120$. The cost of health care is a burden increasingly unbearable for the socially and economically vulnerable communities; [11,22,23].…”