2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-29093-0_20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Socio-technical Arrangements for mHealth: Extending the Mobile Device Use and Adoption Framework

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding TAM related variables, the result shows that both PEU and PU had significant influence on intention to use mHealth. This finding is consistent with the existing literature on the topic that adoption of a system such as mHealth is dependent on usefulness of the systems and how easy it is to use it [ 81 ]. Teo et al [ 82 ] also demonstrated that PU and PEU to be significant determinant of behavioural intention to use technology.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Regarding TAM related variables, the result shows that both PEU and PU had significant influence on intention to use mHealth. This finding is consistent with the existing literature on the topic that adoption of a system such as mHealth is dependent on usefulness of the systems and how easy it is to use it [ 81 ]. Teo et al [ 82 ] also demonstrated that PU and PEU to be significant determinant of behavioural intention to use technology.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Designing mobile applications which can work as a part of wider healthcare system, requires sociotechnical understanding. However, only few studies recommend sociotechnical principles for designing mHealth solutions [119,120].…”
Section: Integratedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The questionnaires were self‐completed and the core survey items represented a range of social and technological factors pertinent to the use of mobile technologies in low‐resource settings. These factors were identified through the analysis of related literature on the socio‐technical determinants of technology use (Sarker & Wells, ; Manda & Msosa, ; Shozi et al., ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%