1967
DOI: 10.1159/000270557
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Socio-Psychological Factors of Aging: A Cohort-Sequential Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The finding is in line with associations found between high rigidity and increased mortality (19). A possible conclusion is that a low validity reflects an ongoing disorder with a fatal course, or a decreased resistence to agentia which would otherwise not have led to death.…”
Section: Mortalitysupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The finding is in line with associations found between high rigidity and increased mortality (19). A possible conclusion is that a low validity reflects an ongoing disorder with a fatal course, or a decreased resistence to agentia which would otherwise not have led to death.…”
Section: Mortalitysupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Riegel et al [1967] and R iegel and Riegel [1972] pointed out that rate of decline, like rate of growth is dependent on both type of task and level of initial ability. Utilizing their own cohort-sequential analysis, they report that age is kinder to the initially more able on certain tasks (e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dementias have been estimated to be the underlying cause of death in at least 70,000–100,000 U.S. residents per year; if so, such a rate would make this disorder the fourth or fifth highest cause of death in the United States (1). Although dementia has been ignored in U.S. Vital Statistics Tables as a cause of death (2, 3), a large number of studies (4–25) have investigated its relationship to mortality (Appendix 1 ). However, although these studies have contributed much to our understanding of the relationship between dementia and mortality, they have not simultaneously answered three questions that are of epidemiologic import to the study of dementia:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… These studies have differed in at least four major ways: 1) the definition of mortality, e.g., years of survival (4–12), versus the probability of surviving X years (8–10, 12–25); 2) the definition of cognitive deficit, e.g., the fixed‐point psychiatric diagnosis of dementia (4–7, 13–25), versus cognitive decline (6, 8–12, 21–23); 3) univariate analyses of the association between dementia/cognitive deficit and mortality (4, 13–19, 24, 25) versus the use of multiple risk factors to predict mortality (5–12, 19–23); and 4) the use of institutional (4–6, 13–18, 20, 22, 24, 25) versus community samples (6–12, 19, 21, 23) for examining the foregoing relationships. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%