2020
DOI: 10.5751/es-11887-250422
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Socio-hydrology: an interplay of design and self-organization in a multilevel world

Abstract: The emerging field of socio-hydrology is a special case of social-ecological systems research that focuses on coupled human-water systems, exploring how the hydrologic cycle and human cultural traits coevolve and how such coevolutions lead to phenomena of relevance to water security and sustainability. As such, most problems tackled by socio-hydrology involve some aspects of engineering design, such as large-scale water infrastructure, and self-organization in a broad context, such as cultural change at the po… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
(97 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Subsequently, a socio-hydrogeological vision was implemented to assess the quality of groundwater [163]. Finally, Yu mentioned that socio-hydrology analyses socio-ecological systems, focusing on the human-water link's co-evolution that favours water safety and sustainability [164].…”
Section: Cited Authors Co-citation Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, a socio-hydrogeological vision was implemented to assess the quality of groundwater [163]. Finally, Yu mentioned that socio-hydrology analyses socio-ecological systems, focusing on the human-water link's co-evolution that favours water safety and sustainability [164].…”
Section: Cited Authors Co-citation Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Socio-hydrological models are often built to formalize hypotheses about the macroscopic (or generic) behavior of human-water systems by schematizing the feedback mechanisms that generate multiple phenomena, risks, and/or unintended consequences (Yu et al 2020). As such, they are different from: (1) predictive quantitative models (more common in hydrology), usually based on physically based equations, but often lacking an explicit representation of human behavior and social dynamics; (2) prescriptive optimization models used for the study of waterresource systems that often assume that people in a real system will make rational and optimal choices (Sterman 2002); and (3) descriptive qualitative methods (more common in social sciences), typically based on the critical analysis of political, cultural, and social processes around specific case studies.…”
Section: Modeling Rationalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among other challenges belong the limited plurality of views on complex socio-hydrological issues (e.g. Yu et al 2020;Roobavannan et al 2018;Massuel et al 2018), pressure on conceptualizing the causal relations in humanwater interaction (e.g. Madani and Shafiee-Jood, 2020;Evers et al 2017;Lane, 2014), underdeveloped fact-checking tools (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%