2019
DOI: 10.1080/03630242.2018.1553814
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Socio-historical evolution of the episiotomy practice: A literature review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
0
7

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
9
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Although routine prophylactic episiotomy was performed during the 1980s to the mid-1990s, concerns on the potential complications associated with episiotomy arose during this period. 1 Since 1996, a large volume of literature has concluded that routine episiotomy is unnecessary and may even increase the risk of 3 rd or 4 th degree perineal laceration. 2 , 3 , 4 The World Health Organization (WHO) and other professional societies recommended restrictive over routine episiotomy since 1990s, although no ideal rate of episiotomy is suggested.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although routine prophylactic episiotomy was performed during the 1980s to the mid-1990s, concerns on the potential complications associated with episiotomy arose during this period. 1 Since 1996, a large volume of literature has concluded that routine episiotomy is unnecessary and may even increase the risk of 3 rd or 4 th degree perineal laceration. 2 , 3 , 4 The World Health Organization (WHO) and other professional societies recommended restrictive over routine episiotomy since 1990s, although no ideal rate of episiotomy is suggested.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Con el fin de caracterizar la práctica de la episiotomía se comienza por una revisión bibliográfica de diversos informes llevados a cabo por organismos internacionales -la ONU o la OMS-a los que se añaden estudios clínicos y estadísticos en obstetricia, matronería y enfermería. Apoyándose en ellos, la autora constata que la episiotomía sigue constituyendo una práctica habitual en gran número de países tanto europeos como latinoamericanos (Clesse et al, 2019), con porcentajes muy por encima de los recomendados, sin una prueba clara de sus beneficios y con variaciones tanto en las categorías de madres a las que se aplica, debidas a la etnicidad, como a la modalidad de parto, en casa o en el hospital. Su definición de esta práctica desde la perspectiva de género lleva a la autora a considerarla una técnica disciplinaria normativizada desde el biopoder (Foucault, 1998) y un buen ejemplo de las múltiples violencias contra las mujeres.…”
Section: Investigaciones Feministasunclassified
“…Finally, combining an epidemiological and sociohistorical approach, Clesse et al (2019) compared the evolution of episiotomy rates worldwide and the factors associated with its generalization and decline. Regarding the French context, they hypothesized that the spread of episiotomy in the 1980s and 1990s ‘was intrinsically linked to the medicalization and institutionalization of birth’ and to ‘[the] cultural influence of the USA and its associated perceived scientific standing’ ( Clesse et al, 2019: 6 ), which favoured the introduction of episiotomy as a routine procedure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%