2022
DOI: 10.1504/ijetm.2022.120713
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Socio-economic innovations in systems analysis: environmental and economic aspects

Abstract: Current socio-economic development framework provides insufficient opportunities to apply traditional decision making and managerial tools. Specifically, it ignores the bifurcation (qualitative) changes in economic systems as well as critical relationships between the economy and environment. This results in nonlinear relationships between socio-economic and environmental factors. In fact, ecological and economic effects are complex multi-factorial phenomena. The paper offers a methodological approach that def… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(18 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The nexus between economic development and environmental degradation has been a focus of environmentalists' inquiries for many years now. According to Yevdokimov et al (2022), there are two opposing views regarding the effect of economic growth on environmental quality. The first one states that economic growth is detrimental to the environment due to inefficient use of resources, which leads to environmental degradation, while the second states that economic growth and technological progress improve environmental quality.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nexus between economic development and environmental degradation has been a focus of environmentalists' inquiries for many years now. According to Yevdokimov et al (2022), there are two opposing views regarding the effect of economic growth on environmental quality. The first one states that economic growth is detrimental to the environment due to inefficient use of resources, which leads to environmental degradation, while the second states that economic growth and technological progress improve environmental quality.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The origins of establishing the quality of life can be traced back to political, socio-economic, ecological, humanistic, medical, and scientific reasons in the middle of the last century (Determann, 2007). Easterlin (2001), Hagerty et al (2001), Layard (2007), Veenhoven (2009), Melnyk et al (2022), Yevdokimov et al (2022), Li and Yang (2023), and Pukeliene and Starkauskiene (2011) have analyzed the quality of life and its measurement. According to the World Health Organization (WHO Quality of Life Assessment Group, 1996), quality of life is described as a person's perception of their life situation in the context of the culture and value systems in which they live, as well as in relation to their goals, expectations, standards, and problems.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%