2015
DOI: 10.5455/wvj.20150852
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Socio-economic Impact of Foot and Mouth Disease in Wildlife- Livestock Interface and Non-Interface of Tanzania

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For gravid domestic ruminants, the prevalence (5%; 95% CI: 3.1–8) was within the range previously reported in Tanzania (Sagamiko et al, ; Shirima, ). In this study, the abortion rate in cattle (5.8%) was lower compared to the previous reports in Tanzania (Mathew, ; Mdetele et al, ). In Zambia, the abortion rate (16.2%) in exposed cattle to brucellosis (history of abortion) was higher compared to our investigation (Muma, Godfroid, Samui, & Skjerve, ).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For gravid domestic ruminants, the prevalence (5%; 95% CI: 3.1–8) was within the range previously reported in Tanzania (Sagamiko et al, ; Shirima, ). In this study, the abortion rate in cattle (5.8%) was lower compared to the previous reports in Tanzania (Mathew, ; Mdetele et al, ). In Zambia, the abortion rate (16.2%) in exposed cattle to brucellosis (history of abortion) was higher compared to our investigation (Muma, Godfroid, Samui, & Skjerve, ).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 74%
“…Due to the socio‐economic importance of brucellosis (abortions, infertilities and reduction of milk production), this zoonotic disease, in Kagera ecosystem, calls for research attention. There are some reports of abortions in domestic animals in Tanzania: 11.3% in Njombe and Mbeya Regions (Mathew, ) and 35% in wildlife–livestock interface and non‐interface of Tanzania (Mdetele, Kasanga, Seth, & Kayunze, ). In addition, non‐negligible pregnancy outcomes in humans (15% of miscarriage at national level) were reported in Tanzania (Keogh et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We further find evidence to support extant literature that suggests that FMD primarily affects milk consumption ( 38 , 39 ). Households in Uganda and Tanzania reported reducing milk consumption by nearly half during an outbreak but maintaining pre-outbreak beef consumption levels.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…These movements lead to frequent contact between flocks, within and between districts, regions and countries, which facilitates the transmission of infectious pathogens such as PPRV and leads to the spread and maintenance of disease in Tanzania [53,63]. Periods of drought can cause long distance movements of livestock to access water and grazing, and can increase the interaction between livestock and wildlife at grazing and watering points [53,70].…”
Section: Extensive Production System With Mobility Of Small Ruminantsmentioning
confidence: 99%