Socio‐economic gradients in prevalent tuberculosis in Zambia and the Western Cape of South Africa

Abstract

ObjectiveTo describe the associations between socio‐economic position and prevalent tuberculosis in the 2010 ZAMSTAR Tuberculosis Prevalence Survey, one of the first large tuberculosis prevalence surveys in Southern Africa in the HIV era.MethodsThe main analyses used data on 34 446 individuals in Zambia and 30 017 individuals in South Africa with evaluable tuberculosis culture results. Logistic regression was used to estimate adjusted odds ratios for prevalent TB by two measures of socio‐economic position: household wealth, derived from data on assets using principal components analysis, and individual educational attainment. Mediation analysis was used to evaluate potential mechanisms for the observed social gradients.ResultsThe quartile with highest household wealth index in Zambia and South Africa had, respectively, 0.55 (95% CI 0.33–0.92) times and 0.70 (95% CI 0.54–0.93) times the adjusted odds of prevalent TB of the bottom quartile. College or university‐educated individuals in Zambia and South Africa had, respectively, 0.25 (95% CI 0.12–0.54) and 0.42 (95% CI 0.25–0.70) times the adjusted odds of prevalent TB of individuals who had received only primary education. We found little evidence that these associations were mediated via several key proximal risk factors for TB, including HIV status.ConclusionThese data suggest that social determinants of TB remain important even in the context of generalised HIV epidemics.

Disparities in access to diagnosis and care in Blantyre, Malawi, identified through enhanced tuberculosis surveillance and spatial analysis

“…Cities—and in particular informal settlements—provide conditions highly conducive to the spread of infectious disease [23], although it is clear that there is considerable social and geographical heterogeneity in the prevalence and incidence of infections, including TB [2, 9]. The prevalence of undiagnosed active TB is known to be high in many urban Africa cities [21, 22].…”

“…A strong socio-economic gradient between poverty and incidence of tuberculosis (TB) has been demonstrated at both population and individual levels [1, 2], with the poorest in society having the greatest risk of developing active TB disease [3]. Poor housing quality, malnutrition, HIV and unhealthy behaviours such as smoking appear to be the major intermediary determinants [4].…”

Socio-Economic Predictors and Distribution of Tuberculosis Incidence in Beijing, China: A Study Using a Combination of Spatial Statistics and GIS Technology

“…Notably, it has already been established that TB is a poverty-related disease [ 36 ] so there is no need to explicitly explain the relationship of per capita GDP with the occurrence of TB. In fact, wealth indices have been found to be significantly associated with TB infection in Zambia and South Africa too [ 48 ]. Consistent findings have been found in the previous studies [ 21 , 36 ], which means that if the per capita GDP increases, TB incidence decreases, confirming that lower economic status is a risk predictor for TB incidence.…”

Tuberculosis and malaria walk side by side in the Brazilian Amazon: an ecological approach

“…The transmission progression of both TB and malaria is strongly influenced by socio‐economic factors, which why they were included in the present study . The retrospective design based on data obtained from two different public health information systems is a limitation to the study, since the variables assessed are restricted to the data collected and the quality of the surveillance systems.…”