2000
DOI: 10.1007/bf03219732
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Socio-economic disadvantage, literacy and social justice: Learning from longitudinal case study research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…'De cit' explanations that individualise failure in students (often living in poverty and other disadvantaging circumstances) and their teachers (often in public schools) have been deployed to serve these agendas. They have effectively shifted the blame for social disadvantage from dominant interests to their victims, and to health, education and welfare professionals who work with them (Apple, 2000;Comber & Hill, 2000). In contrast, critical insight into the educational construction of advantage and disadvantage in contemporary social, cultural and pedagogic conditions is required if teachers are to re-invigorate social justice agenda for the sake of the children in our increasingly divided societies who cannot say with optimism that 'all the things are well done by "my dear mother"-the Party' (or its local equivalent).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…'De cit' explanations that individualise failure in students (often living in poverty and other disadvantaging circumstances) and their teachers (often in public schools) have been deployed to serve these agendas. They have effectively shifted the blame for social disadvantage from dominant interests to their victims, and to health, education and welfare professionals who work with them (Apple, 2000;Comber & Hill, 2000). In contrast, critical insight into the educational construction of advantage and disadvantage in contemporary social, cultural and pedagogic conditions is required if teachers are to re-invigorate social justice agenda for the sake of the children in our increasingly divided societies who cannot say with optimism that 'all the things are well done by "my dear mother"-the Party' (or its local equivalent).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through their curriculum, pedagogy and assessment, teachers can either: silence students by denying their voice, that is, by refusing to allow them to speak from their own histories, experiences, and social positions, or [they] can enable them to speak by being attentive to how different voices can be constituted within specific pedagogical relations so as to engage their histories and experiences in both an affirmative and critical way. (Giroux, 1990, p. 91) Instead of being a site of 'disjunction and dislocation' (Comber & Hill, 2000), schools can relate curricula to students' worlds, making the classroom more inclusive by legitimating locally produced knowledge. While schools need to create an environment that values and appreciates cultural differences, recognising the cultural symbols that are important to their students does not mean that teachers 'abandon their responsibility to make [academic] judgments … for the young, nor does it mean that they adopt a vacuous cultural relativism' (Dyson, 1997, p. 180).…”
Section: It Should Be Clear Then Thatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This pre-service teacher explicitly works against the fact that many schools continue to give priority to the stories of the lives enjoyed by 'well-off, highly educated and socially conforming groups' (Hattam, Shacklock & Smyth, 1998). However, she also recognises that there is mutual benefit for marginalised and dominant students alike in catering for As is illustrated here, instead of being a site of 'disjunction and dislocation' (Comber & Hill, 2000), schools can relate curricula to students' worlds and in doing so make the classroom more inclusive. That is, teachers can engage students' histories and experiences in both an affirmative and critical way (Giroux, 1990).…”
Section: (Kim Interview 1)mentioning
confidence: 91%