“…Through their curriculum, pedagogy and assessment, teachers can either: silence students by denying their voice, that is, by refusing to allow them to speak from their own histories, experiences, and social positions, or [they] can enable them to speak by being attentive to how different voices can be constituted within specific pedagogical relations so as to engage their histories and experiences in both an affirmative and critical way. (Giroux, 1990, p. 91) Instead of being a site of 'disjunction and dislocation' (Comber & Hill, 2000), schools can relate curricula to students' worlds, making the classroom more inclusive by legitimating locally produced knowledge. While schools need to create an environment that values and appreciates cultural differences, recognising the cultural symbols that are important to their students does not mean that teachers 'abandon their responsibility to make [academic] judgments … for the young, nor does it mean that they adopt a vacuous cultural relativism' (Dyson, 1997, p. 180).…”