2012
DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/cks158
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Socio-economic differences in participation of households in a Belgian national health survey

Abstract: Socio-economic inequalities in participation can introduce a bias in the health survey findings. Strategies targeting improvement of the participation of lower socio-economic groups need to be considered.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
51
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
7
51
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have shown that such surveys tend to slightly over-represent those categorised in the highest socioeconomic class. 44 If this is the case, and the excluded cases from lower socioeconomic groups were to have even more adverse risk factor profiles, then we may have underestimated inequalities in our study. However, our findings accord well with broader international comparisons which have adopted similar methods for studying trends in absolute and relative inequality in CVD incidence 45 but it should be noted that a substantial proportion of the educational differentials in incidence is not explained by trends in risk factors (or indeed case fatality).…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Previous studies have shown that such surveys tend to slightly over-represent those categorised in the highest socioeconomic class. 44 If this is the case, and the excluded cases from lower socioeconomic groups were to have even more adverse risk factor profiles, then we may have underestimated inequalities in our study. However, our findings accord well with broader international comparisons which have adopted similar methods for studying trends in absolute and relative inequality in CVD incidence 45 but it should be noted that a substantial proportion of the educational differentials in incidence is not explained by trends in risk factors (or indeed case fatality).…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Nevertheless, a possible over-representation of individuals with a higher socioeconomic status in the childhood leukemia survivor population may also explain the positive results regarding employment and should be discussed both in light of social disparities in childhood AL survival rates previously shown [36,37] and also of ethnical disparities in childhood AL incidence [38], even if a link with a socioeconomic bias is not reported. Furthermore, the socioeconomic status of survey respondents is often higher than for non-respondents [39][40][41]. Unfortunately, the available data did not allow us to compare the repartition of socioeconomic status between our cohort and the general French population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a target sample of about 100 residents in each neighbourhood, with an estimate of 10% response rate, approximately 1,000 residents were sampled in each neighbourhood. Given varying expected response rate according to neighbourhood SES , 1,200 adults were sampled in low SES neighbourhoods and 800 in high SES neighbourhoods. Finally, a total of 12 neighbourhoods per neighbourhood type were selected.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%