2021
DOI: 10.15826/recon.2021.7.3.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Socio-economic consequences of the first and second waves of the pandemic in Russian regions

Abstract: Relevance. The spread of the coronavirus infection and the ensuing economic restrictions significantly influenced the main parameters of the socio-economic development of Russia and its territories, affecting the growth rate, production structure, territorial differentiation and competitiveness of Russian regions. Purpose of the study. The key goal of the study was to identify the socio-economic changes in the development of the country and its regions during the pandemic. Data and Methods. The analysis relies… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Its economy was characterized by sectoral and spatial diversity (Akhunov, 2021). In the recent years, however, the extractive industries have come to play a more dominant role in the economy, the country still recovering from the consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic (Pobedin, 2021). Being embedded into the world economic system, Russia is also reliant on imported technologies, materials and spare parts (Aalto, 2016).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its economy was characterized by sectoral and spatial diversity (Akhunov, 2021). In the recent years, however, the extractive industries have come to play a more dominant role in the economy, the country still recovering from the consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic (Pobedin, 2021). Being embedded into the world economic system, Russia is also reliant on imported technologies, materials and spare parts (Aalto, 2016).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is more likely, however, that the very option of federal assistance in the regional debt policy in reality brings instability to the formal rules and shows the low level of autonomy of regional authorities (Klimanov V., Kazakova S., & Mikhaylova A., 2020). In the short term, it might be beneficial both for the borrower and the lender; in the long term, however, increased uncertainty reduces the efficiency of resource allocation as indicated by the abundant literature on soft budget constraints (Sinelnikov-Murylev S. et al, 2006;Pettersson-Lidbom, Dahlberg, 2003). Such a system is characterized by ineffective budgetary expenditures and reduced incentives to mobilize regional budget revenues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various studies focused on predicting the impact of external factors on security and resilience of regional socio-economic systems; in 2020, particular attention was paid to assessing the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic (Pobedin, Balynskaya & Williams, 2021;Romanova & Ponomareva, 2021;Turgel & Usoltseva, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%