Socio-ecological context and the interpersonal theory of suicide: A response to Hjelmeland &amp; Knizek

Smith, Phillip N.; Schuler, Kaitlyn R.; Fadoir, Nicholas A.; Marie, Laura; Basu, Natasha

doi:10.1080/07481187.2019.1586799

Cited by 13 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Studies that include multiple contributors are suggested to better reflect the ideation-to-action framework foundation and are more likely to assist in advancing suicide capability as a multifaceted concept. Given there is a dearth of research that has combined contributors, perhaps it is worthwhile to explore more than one contributor at a time using qualitative research grounded in lived experience [ 42 , 43 , 65 , 152 , 153 ]. This will help towards discovering insights about the nature and development of suicide capability because knowledge will be generated from individuals who evidently have a capability for suicide.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Suicide capability within the ideation-to-action framework: A systematic scoping review

Bayliss

Christensen²,

Lamont‐Mills³

et al. 2022

PLoS ONE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Suicide capability is theorised to facilitate the movement from suicidal ideation to suicide attempt. Three types of contributors are posited to comprise suicide capability: acquired, dispositional, and practical. Despite suicide capability being critical in the movement from ideation-to-attempt, there has been no systematic synthesis of empirical evidence relating to suicide capability that would enable further development and refinement of the concept. This study sought to address this synthesis gap. A scoping review was conducted on suicide capability studies published January 2005 to January 2022. Eleven electronic databases and grey literature sources were searched returning 5,212 potential studies. After exclusion criteria application, 90 studies were included for final analysis. Results synthesis followed a textual narrative approach allocating studies based on contributors of suicide capability. Most studies focused on investigating only one factor within contributors. Painful and provocative events appear to contribute to acquired capability more so than fearlessness about death. Whilst emerging evidence for dispositional and practical contributors is promising, the small number of studies prevents further conclusions from being drawn. An unexpected additional cognitive contributor was identified. The focus of a single factor from most studies and the limited number of studies on contributors other than acquired capability limits the theoretical development and practical application of suicide capability knowledge. Given that suicide is a complex and multifaceted behaviour, future research that incorporates a combination of contributors is more likely to advance our understandings of suicide capability.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Suicide capability within the ideation-to-action framework: A systematic scoping review

Bayliss

Christensen²,

Lamont‐Mills³

et al. 2022

PLoS ONE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The ITS is also unique in that it attempts to explain why suicide risk factors (e.g., divorce, impulsivity) are, in fact, risk factors. Suicide risk factors and social-ecological or contextual factors influence suicidal thoughts and behavior by operating through or moderating ITS constructs (Smith, Schuler, Fadoir, Marie, & Basu, in press; Van Orden et al, 2010). These factors considered alongside the comparatively larger empirical literature supporting the ITS over the last decade make the ITS uniquely suited for examining how R/S influences the relation of posttraumatic stress with suicidal thoughts and behavior.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

PTSD, religious coping, and interpersonal antecedents of suicidal desire among military veterans: An initial examination of moderation models.

Carroll¹,

McCormick²,

Smith³

et al. 2020

Psychology of Religion and Spirituality

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Suicide is a leading cause of death among Service Members and Veterans (SM/Vs) who suffer from posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Recent research has found significant associations between the interpersonal theory of suicide (ITS) and PTSD symptomatology. Furthermore, findings suggest positive and negative forms of religious coping can varyingly contribute to risk for both PTSD and suicidal behavior. However, models of suicidal ideation to action (e.g., ITS), to our knowledge, have not accounted for the role of religious coping. As such, this study examined the possible influence of both positive and negative religious coping on pathways between PTSD and suicidal desire (i.e., thwarted belongingness [TB] and perceived burdensomeness [PB]) in a community sample of 201 SM/Vs. Analyses revealed positive religious coping may be a significant protective factor for TB, but not PB, even in presence of high PTSD symptomatology. Additionally, negative religious coping appeared to exacerbate the impact of PTSD symptomatology on PB. These findings highlight the potential benefit in assessing for religiousness and/or spirituality (R/S) factors when conceptualizing risk for suicide.

show abstract

“…For this review, it is anticipated that the subgroups will include the three contributors to suicide capacity as suggested by the theories within the ideation-to-action framework. [16][17][18][19][20][21] The second step involves producing commentaries for each study regarding key variables and themes while addressing limitations such as study design and bias. To systematically appraise the quality of each study, an adaptation of a JBI 59 critical appraisal tool checklist will be used addressing participant groups, confounding factors, measures used and analytical techniques.…”

Section: Stage 5: Collating Summarising and Reporting The Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…17 Given the poor utility of previously associated risk factors with suicide attempts, it is hoped that shifting research to examine factors within an ideation-to-action framework that differentiates between non-attempting ideators and suicide attempters will help towards understanding the movement from ideation to action. 18 Within this framework, a core facilitator of the transition from suicidal thoughts to suicide attempt appears to be the individual's capacity for suicide. This is defined as the combination of contributing factors that enable an individual to make an attempt on their life.…”

Section: Open Accessmentioning

confidence: 99%

Suicide capacity within the ideation-to-action framework: a scoping review protocol

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IntroductionA core facilitator of the transition from suicidal thoughts to suicide attempt is the individual’s capacity for suicide. Suicide capacity is a theoretically universal concept adaptable for specific groups that is hypothesised to comprise three contributing factors: acquired capability, for example, previous self-harm; dispositional, such as genetic influences and practical, knowledge of and access to lethal means. Given that suicide capacity as a concept is continuing to develop, a review and synthesis of the current literature is timely to ensure future research and development of suicide prevention strategies are based on evidential knowledge. The aim of this review is to map the available evidence to provide an overview of factors that contribute to an adult’s capacity for suicide.Methods and analysisThis review will encompass five stages. Studies will be identified through broad search strings applied to 11 academic databases: Academic Search Ultimate, APA PsycArticles, APA PsycINFO, CINAHL, Psychology & Behavioural Sciences, & Sociology Source Ultimate via EBSCOHost Megafile Ultimate; PubMed; Science Direct; Wiley Online; Taylor & Francis and ProQuest dissertations and theses. Grey literature databases and key suicide organisations will also be searched for relevant literature. Two reviewers will independently screen titles and abstracts then review full texts to identify articles meeting inclusion criteria. Articles will be assessed for eligibility based on suicide attempt history, primary research study design, language and publication date. Data from eligible full texts will be extracted using a predesigned template for analysis. The synthesisation method will be textual narrative synthesis with an incorporated quality appraisal checklist tool.Ethics and disseminationEthics approval is not required for this scoping review as no human participants are involved. Study findings will be shared with key suicide organisations, through peer-reviewed publications, and conference presentations.

show abstract

Socio-ecological context and the interpersonal theory of suicide: A response to Hjelmeland & Knizek

Cited by 13 publications

References 18 publications

Suicide capability within the ideation-to-action framework: A systematic scoping review

Suicide capability within the ideation-to-action framework: A systematic scoping review

PTSD, religious coping, and interpersonal antecedents of suicidal desire among military veterans: An initial examination of moderation models.

Suicide capacity within the ideation-to-action framework: a scoping review protocol

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About