Socio-demographic Characteristics and Mode of Traumatic Thoraco-Lumbar Spine Injuries at a Referral Tertiary Care Hospital in Bangladesh

Abstract

Background: Traumatic thoraco-lumbar spine injuries occur in different ways during working.Objectives: The purpose of the present study was to find out the-demographic Characteristics and Mode of Traumatic Thoraco-Lumbar Spine Injuries.Methodology: This cross-sectional study was conducted at the National Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedic Rehabilitation (NITOR), Dhaka, Bangladesh from July 2004 to June 2006 for a period of 2(two) years. Patients with diagnosed cases of traumatic thoraco-lumbar spinal injury with complete or incomplete cord lesion irrespective of sex were selected as study population. An elaborate history of the selected patient was taken with an emphasis of mechanism, time of injury, past history of illness.Result: A total number of 17 patients with thoracolumbar spine injury were recruited. Out of 17 patients, 7(41.2%) patients were in the age group of 21-30 years that is very younger age group. The mean age was 29.29 years. The male and female ratio was 4.7:1. In this series most affected people are farmer (47.05%). Most affected groups are injured by fall from height (70.58%) especially from tree and from roof of the buildings.Conclusion: Young age group male workers are most commonly affected in traumatic thoraco-lumbar spine injuries.Journal of National Institute of Neurosciences Bangladesh, 2018;4(1): 51-53

Victimization Status Among Persons with Disabilities and its Predictors: Evidence from Bangladesh National Survey on Persons with Disabilities

“…Limited awareness and education about disability rights and inclusion may perpetuate harmful stereotypes and increase vulnerability to victimization [21]. Inadequate support systems and services for persons with disabilities leave them more susceptible to exploitation and abuse [9]. Economic hardship and social inequality faced by persons with disabilities in Bangladesh may increase their vulnerability, as they often have limited access to healthcare, education, and employment opportunities [30].…”

“…In contrast, older individuals may have developed stronger social networks and relationships, providing greater protection against victimization [34]. Developmental factors may also play a role, with younger persons facing unique challenges related to social integration and peer relationships, while older individuals may have developed coping strategies and resilience [9, 14]. Additionally, differences in access to support systems, protective factors, and resources may contribute to variations in victimization likelihood among different age groups.…”

“…This trend is mirrored in Bangladesh, an LMIC currently experiencing substantial advancements in healthcare facilities, medical technology, and an increase in road traffic injuries [6, 7]. As of 2022, Bangladesh is home to over four and a half million persons with disabilities, accounting for 2.79% of the total population [8, 9].…”

“…Other misconceptions include viewing persons with disabilities as burdens on society and as dependent groups. These existing community-level challenges in LMICs, including high unemployment rates and an education system that lacks disability-friendly provisions, can exacerbate these issues by impeding the ability of persons with disabilities to engage with mainstream society [9]. As a result, persons with disabilities in LMICs often rely on social safety net programs operated by governmental and non-governmental organizations or on support from family members to meet their basic needs, including food, education, and healthcare [14].…”

Demographic, Clinical Features and Outcome Determinants of Thoracic Trauma in Sri Lanka: A Multicentre Prospective Cohort Study

“…ere are major differences of the reported demographic patterns, associated injuries, and complications of thoracic trauma in different regions of the world [14][15][16]. However, these data are sparse in the developing countries such as Sri Lanka, probably due to the unavailability of a national electronic trauma registry system.…”