Society–Military Relations in a State-in-the-Making

Abstract

The participation of the Palestinian Authority's (PA's) security agencies in the armed struggle against Israel in the second Palestinian uprising (2000)(2001)(2002)(2003)(2004)(2005) is analyzed in this article as a response to the demand of Palestinian society, thus as a unique case of armed forces which, in the lack of political directive, became more attentive to public opinion. The article shows how Palestinian public discourse in the late 1990s-early 2000s, that was shaped by the Islamic movement of Hamas, portrayed the PA's security officials as traitors. Members of the PA security agencies (mainly Fatah members) sought to reposition themselves in the ''national camp,'' and this motivated them to raise their weapons against Israeli targets. By doing so, they also removed the mental burden of turning their weapons against fellow Palestinians that was one of the major sources for their image as collaborators.

Judicial Framing and Immigration Policymaking: Israel's Policy toward Self-Claiming Palestinian Informers

“…The use of human intelligence, particularly the recruitment of Palestinian informers, has been a constant element of Israel's struggle to establish and secure a Jewish state (Cohen 2004; Gelber 1992, 528–547; Lefen 1997, 226–246; Sa’di 2003). Following the Six-Day War of 1967 and the Israeli military occupation of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, the recruitment and use of Palestinian security collaborators became one of Israel's main tools for maintaining its control of the occupied territories and protecting the lives of Israeli citizens inside and outside the former Green Line border (Israel's pre-1967 border) (Cohen 2012, 469).…”