Integrating Biological Control Into Conservation Practice 2016
DOI: 10.1002/9781118392553.ch11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Societal values expressed through policy and regulations concerning biological control releases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Permitting processes for biocontrol agent releases may differ widely among countries (Sheppard and Warner 2016), but host specificity tests are widely standardized (Wapshere 1974). Despite further refinements proposed and implemented in subsequent years (Briese 2005;Clement and Cristofaro 1995;Sheppard et al 2005;USDA 2016), this sequence of testing has largely remained state-of-the-art, providing overwhelmingly safe weed biocontrol agents.…”
Section: Lack Of Evidence For Evolution Of Dietary Preferences In Weementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Permitting processes for biocontrol agent releases may differ widely among countries (Sheppard and Warner 2016), but host specificity tests are widely standardized (Wapshere 1974). Despite further refinements proposed and implemented in subsequent years (Briese 2005;Clement and Cristofaro 1995;Sheppard et al 2005;USDA 2016), this sequence of testing has largely remained state-of-the-art, providing overwhelmingly safe weed biocontrol agents.…”
Section: Lack Of Evidence For Evolution Of Dietary Preferences In Weementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, a variety of international and local regulations now govern the processes used to import and release BCAs into different jurisdictions (Ehlers 2011;Barratt et al 2017Barratt et al , 2018IPPC 2017;Ehlers et al 2020). Many countries require that candidate BCAs undergo host-specificity testing to ensure agents are fit for purpose and do not pose unnecessary risks to local biota (Hunt et al 2008(Hunt et al , 2011Sheppard & Warner 2016;Heimpel & Cock 2018). Pre-release risk assessment frameworks emphasise the importance of defining a BCA's physiological (= fundamental) host range, defined as the group of species in the introduced range that are accepted as hosts, and are compatible for development of the agent (Van Driesche et al 2004;Babendreier et al 2005;Bigler et al 2006;van Lenteren et al 2006;Barratt 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many countries require that candidate BCAs undergo host‐specificity testing to ensure agents are fit for purpose and do not pose unnecessary risks to local biota (Hunt et al . 2008, 2011; Sheppard & Warner 2016; Heimpel & Cock 2018). Pre‐release risk assessment frameworks emphasise the importance of defining a BCA's physiological (= fundamental) host range, defined as the group of species in the introduced range that are accepted as hosts, and are compatible for development of the agent (Van Driesche et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%